How to read this. The gap is the median asking price against the
median price actually paid at auction over the last three years, for the
same reference and the same brand. A large positive gap means sellers ask
far more than the hammer supports. A negative gap means recent auction
results have run ahead of what dealers are asking.
What it is not. Auction and retail are different markets: retail
carries warranty, service and recourse that a hammer price does not, so
some premium is normal. Treat this as a question to ask, not an answer.
Show me
Brand
Budget, what it sells for
Evidence
| Watch | Asking, median | Sold, median | Gap | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rolex
Ref. 6105
|
A$16,742 | A$5,045 | +231.9% Far above auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 6105 is listed at about A$16,742, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,045 at auction. That is A$11,697 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 5512
|
A$59,993 | A$18,570 | +223.1% Far above auction | 12 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 5512 is listed at about A$59,993, while the same reference has been settling at A$18,570 at auction. That is A$41,423 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 9 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 5508
|
A$62,783 | A$21,486 | +192.2% Far above auction | 3 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 5508 is listed at about A$62,783, while the same reference has been settling at A$21,486 at auction. That is A$41,298 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 5 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1579
|
A$209,278 | A$95,682 | +118.7% Far above auction | 3 asks · 6 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1579 is listed at about A$209,278, while the same reference has been settling at A$95,682 at auction. That is A$113,596 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 6 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6238
|
A$168,818 | A$79,735 | +111.7% Far above auction | 6 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 6238 is listed at about A$168,818, while the same reference has been settling at A$79,735 at auction. That is A$89,083 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 12 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1463
|
A$418,556 | A$212,627 | +96.9% Well above auction | 3 asks · 7 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1463 is listed at about A$418,556, while the same reference has been settling at A$212,627 at auction. That is A$205,930 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 7 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 4100ST
|
A$47,436 | A$26,090 | +81.8% Well above auction | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 4100ST is listed at about A$47,436, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,090 at auction. That is A$21,346 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116508
|
A$99,058 | A$56,700 | +74.7% Well above auction | 35 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116508 is listed at about A$99,058, while the same reference has been settling at A$56,700 at auction. That is A$42,358 more than the hammer, on 35 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1007
|
A$4,667 | A$2,679 | +74.2% Well above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 1007 is listed at about A$4,667, while the same reference has been settling at A$2,679 at auction. That is A$1,988 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
IWC
Ref. 3714
|
A$6,836 | A$3,990 | +71.3% Well above auction | 11 asks · 3 sales thin |
| IWC 3714 is listed at about A$6,836, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,990 at auction. That is A$2,846 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 69173
|
A$6,104 | A$3,572 | +70.9% Well above auction | 214 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 69173 is listed at about A$6,104, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,572 at auction. That is A$2,532 more than the hammer, on 214 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Grand Seiko
Ref. SBGM239
|
A$7,604 | A$4,489 | +69.4% Well above auction | 4 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Grand Seiko SBGM239 is listed at about A$7,604, while the same reference has been settling at A$4,489 at auction. That is A$3,115 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79280
|
A$6,488 | A$3,831 | +69.3% Well above auction | 27 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Tudor 79280 is listed at about A$6,488, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,831 at auction. That is A$2,656 more than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 56175ST
|
A$25,113 | A$16,114 | +55.8% Well above auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 56175ST is listed at about A$25,113, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,114 at auction. That is A$8,999 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 78086
|
A$16,673 | A$10,715 | +55.6% Well above auction | 5 asks · 9 sales thin |
| Cartier 78086 is listed at about A$16,673, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,715 at auction. That is A$5,957 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 9 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Zenith
Ref. 03.3100.3600/21.M3100
|
A$12,708 | A$8,441 | +50.6% Well above auction | 18 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Zenith 03.3100.3600/21.M3100 is listed at about A$12,708, while the same reference has been settling at A$8,441 at auction. That is A$4,267 more than the hammer, on 18 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5402BA
|
A$137,426 | A$93,275 | +47.3% Well above auction | 8 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Audemars Piguet 5402BA is listed at about A$137,426, while the same reference has been settling at A$93,275 at auction. That is A$44,151 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 6 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700/1A
|
A$199,688 | A$136,211 | +46.6% Well above auction | 4 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3700/1A is listed at about A$199,688, while the same reference has been settling at A$136,211 at auction. That is A$63,478 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6239
|
A$160,447 | A$109,766 | +46.2% Well above auction | 21 asks · 18 sales strong |
| Rolex 6239 is listed at about A$160,447, while the same reference has been settling at A$109,766 at auction. That is A$50,680 more than the hammer, on 21 asking prices and 18 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16203
|
A$10,272 | A$7,143 | +43.8% Well above auction | 12 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16203 is listed at about A$10,272, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,143 at auction. That is A$3,129 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 7928
|
A$15,556 | A$10,877 | +43.0% Well above auction | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Tudor 7928 is listed at about A$15,556, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,877 at auction. That is A$4,679 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126300
|
A$15,068 | A$10,548 | +42.9% Well above auction | 337 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126300 is listed at about A$15,068, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,548 at auction. That is A$4,520 more than the hammer, on 337 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5070P001
|
A$299,965 | A$213,324 | +40.6% Well above auction | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5070P001 is listed at about A$299,965, while the same reference has been settling at A$213,324 at auction. That is A$86,641 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1501
|
A$5,021 | A$3,607 | +39.2% Above auction | 27 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 1501 is listed at about A$5,021, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,607 at auction. That is A$1,414 more than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 6 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6234
|
A$58,598 | A$42,525 | +37.8% Above auction | 5 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 6234 is listed at about A$58,598, while the same reference has been settling at A$42,525 at auction. That is A$16,073 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1016
|
A$25,811 | A$19,643 | +31.4% Above auction | 58 asks · 18 sales strong |
| Rolex 1016 is listed at about A$25,811, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,643 at auction. That is A$6,168 more than the hammer, on 58 asking prices and 18 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5980/1A014
|
A$149,327 | A$114,266 | +30.7% Above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5980/1A014 is listed at about A$149,327, while the same reference has been settling at A$114,266 at auction. That is A$35,061 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM010
|
A$182,764 | A$140,635 | +30.0% Above auction | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM010 is listed at about A$182,764, while the same reference has been settling at A$140,635 at auction. That is A$42,129 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16220
|
A$8,266 | A$6,369 | +29.8% Above auction | 111 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16220 is listed at about A$8,266, while the same reference has been settling at A$6,369 at auction. That is A$1,897 more than the hammer, on 111 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116595RBOW
|
A$659,924 | A$509,802 | +29.5% Above auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116595RBOW is listed at about A$659,924, while the same reference has been settling at A$509,802 at auction. That is A$150,122 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Vacheron Constantin
Ref. 4072
|
A$96,268 | A$74,419 | +29.4% Above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Vacheron Constantin 4072 is listed at about A$96,268, while the same reference has been settling at A$74,419 at auction. That is A$21,849 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 216570
|
A$15,347 | A$11,866 | +29.3% Above auction | 204 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 216570 is listed at about A$15,347, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,866 at auction. That is A$3,481 more than the hammer, on 204 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 226570
|
A$17,858 | A$13,812 | +29.3% Above auction | 142 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 226570 is listed at about A$17,858, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,812 at auction. That is A$4,046 more than the hammer, on 142 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5960P001
|
A$68,015 | A$52,738 | +29.0% Above auction | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5960P001 is listed at about A$68,015, while the same reference has been settling at A$52,738 at auction. That is A$15,277 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 8880
|
A$10,290 | A$8,036 | +28.0% Above auction | 10 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 8880 is listed at about A$10,290, while the same reference has been settling at A$8,036 at auction. That is A$2,253 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 56303ST
|
A$21,591 | A$16,882 | +27.9% Above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 56303ST is listed at about A$21,591, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,882 at auction. That is A$4,709 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Omega
Ref. 3570.50
|
A$6,278 | A$4,911 | +27.8% Above auction | 84 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Omega 3570.50 is listed at about A$6,278, while the same reference has been settling at A$4,911 at auction. That is A$1,367 more than the hammer, on 84 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Vacheron Constantin
Ref. 4600E/000AB487
|
A$17,942 | A$14,064 | +27.6% Above auction | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Vacheron Constantin 4600E/000AB487 is listed at about A$17,942, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,064 at auction. That is A$3,879 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16610
|
A$13,673 | A$10,744 | +27.3% Above auction | 234 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16610 is listed at about A$13,673, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,744 at auction. That is A$2,929 more than the hammer, on 234 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 2510
|
A$4,290 | A$3,393 | +26.4% Above auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Cartier 2510 is listed at about A$4,290, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,393 at auction. That is A$897.11 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3548
|
A$14,649 | A$11,608 | +26.2% Above auction | 13 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3548 is listed at about A$14,649, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,608 at auction. That is A$3,042 more than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126600
|
A$19,254 | A$15,347 | +25.5% Above auction | 142 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 126600 is listed at about A$19,254, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,347 at auction. That is A$3,907 more than the hammer, on 142 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1675
|
A$24,416 | A$19,644 | +24.3% Above auction | 129 asks · 43 sales strong |
| Rolex 1675 is listed at about A$24,416, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,644 at auction. That is A$4,772 more than the hammer, on 129 asking prices and 43 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16700
|
A$17,963 | A$14,580 | +23.2% Above auction | 93 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16700 is listed at about A$17,963, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,580 at auction. That is A$3,383 more than the hammer, on 93 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116500LN
|
A$41,019 | A$33,380 | +22.9% Above auction | 114 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 116500LN is listed at about A$41,019, while the same reference has been settling at A$33,380 at auction. That is A$7,639 more than the hammer, on 114 asking prices and 6 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16233
|
A$9,069 | A$7,383 | +22.8% Above auction | 296 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16233 is listed at about A$9,069, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,383 at auction. That is A$1,685 more than the hammer, on 296 asking prices and 9 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Omega
Ref. 210.90.42.20.01.001
|
A$12,204 | A$9,976 | +22.3% Above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Omega 210.90.42.20.01.001 is listed at about A$12,204, while the same reference has been settling at A$9,976 at auction. That is A$2,229 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126200
|
A$12,836 | A$10,631 | +20.7% Above auction | 173 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126200 is listed at about A$12,836, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,631 at auction. That is A$2,204 more than the hammer, on 173 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 2526
|
A$132,543 | A$110,394 | +20.1% Above auction | 11 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 2526 is listed at about A$132,543, while the same reference has been settling at A$110,394 at auction. That is A$22,149 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 12 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5726A001
|
A$115,522 | A$96,687 | +19.5% Above auction | 10 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5726A001 is listed at about A$115,522, while the same reference has been settling at A$96,687 at auction. That is A$18,835 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 228239
|
A$64,876 | A$54,496 | +19.1% Above auction | 29 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 228239 is listed at about A$64,876, while the same reference has been settling at A$54,496 at auction. That is A$10,380 more than the hammer, on 29 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1603
|
A$6,132 | A$5,176 | +18.5% Above auction | 93 asks · 10 sales fair |
| Rolex 1603 is listed at about A$6,132, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,176 at auction. That is A$955.70 more than the hammer, on 93 asking prices and 10 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5065A001
|
A$62,783 | A$53,157 | +18.1% Above auction | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5065A001 is listed at about A$62,783, while the same reference has been settling at A$53,157 at auction. That is A$9,627 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 114060
|
A$16,463 | A$14,043 | +17.2% Above auction | 148 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 114060 is listed at about A$16,463, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,043 at auction. That is A$2,421 more than the hammer, on 148 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1500
|
A$5,302 | A$4,527 | +17.1% Above auction | 97 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 1500 is listed at about A$5,302, while the same reference has been settling at A$4,527 at auction. That is A$774.33 more than the hammer, on 97 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 5513
|
A$17,440 | A$14,983 | +16.4% Above auction | 132 asks · 28 sales strong |
| Rolex 5513 is listed at about A$17,440, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,983 at auction. That is A$2,457 more than the hammer, on 132 asking prices and 28 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5212A001
|
A$57,063 | A$49,222 | +15.9% Above auction | 12 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5212A001 is listed at about A$57,063, while the same reference has been settling at A$49,222 at auction. That is A$7,841 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126710BLNR
|
A$26,507 | A$22,902 | +15.7% Above auction | 179 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 126710BLNR is listed at about A$26,507, while the same reference has been settling at A$22,902 at auction. That is A$3,605 more than the hammer, on 179 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 326934
|
A$29,927 | A$25,886 | +15.6% Above auction | 80 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 326934 is listed at about A$29,927, while the same reference has been settling at A$25,886 at auction. That is A$4,040 more than the hammer, on 80 asking prices and 6 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16718
|
A$38,716 | A$33,666 | +15.0% Above auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16718 is listed at about A$38,716, while the same reference has been settling at A$33,666 at auction. That is A$5,051 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16710
|
A$18,835 | A$16,498 | +14.2% In line | 212 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 16710 is listed at about A$18,835, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,498 at auction. That is A$2,337 more than the hammer, on 212 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5905/1A001
|
A$80,684 | A$70,876 | +13.8% In line | 11 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5905/1A001 is listed at about A$80,684, while the same reference has been settling at A$70,876 at auction. That is A$9,808 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5522A001
|
A$66,969 | A$59,135 | +13.3% In line | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5522A001 is listed at about A$66,969, while the same reference has been settling at A$59,135 at auction. That is A$7,834 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16750
|
A$18,068 | A$16,028 | +12.7% In line | 45 asks · 10 sales fair |
| Rolex 16750 is listed at about A$18,068, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,028 at auction. That is A$2,040 more than the hammer, on 45 asking prices and 10 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6542
|
A$75,337 | A$67,332 | +11.9% In line | 4 asks · 7 sales thin |
| Rolex 6542 is listed at about A$75,337, while the same reference has been settling at A$67,332 at auction. That is A$8,005 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 5850
|
A$7,918 | A$7,143 | +10.8% In line | 12 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 5850 is listed at about A$7,918, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,143 at auction. That is A$774.33 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116710LN
|
A$17,789 | A$16,114 | +10.4% In line | 130 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116710LN is listed at about A$17,789, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,114 at auction. That is A$1,674 more than the hammer, on 130 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
H. Moser
Ref. 62001200
|
A$31,252 | A$28,350 | +10.2% In line | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| H. Moser 62001200 is listed at about A$31,252, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,350 at auction. That is A$2,902 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5236P001
|
A$146,495 | A$132,892 | +10.2% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5236P001 is listed at about A$146,495, while the same reference has been settling at A$132,892 at auction. That is A$13,603 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116400GV
|
A$16,603 | A$15,061 | +10.2% In line | 150 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116400GV is listed at about A$16,603, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,061 at auction. That is A$1,542 more than the hammer, on 150 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116688
|
A$50,227 | A$46,069 | +9.0% In line | 13 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116688 is listed at about A$50,227, while the same reference has been settling at A$46,069 at auction. That is A$4,158 more than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3604
|
A$29,299 | A$26,919 | +8.8% In line | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3604 is listed at about A$29,299, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,919 at auction. That is A$2,380 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700/1
|
A$192,536 | A$177,538 | +8.5% In line | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3700/1 is listed at about A$192,536, while the same reference has been settling at A$177,538 at auction. That is A$14,998 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16618
|
A$38,368 | A$35,438 | +8.3% In line | 38 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 16618 is listed at about A$38,368, while the same reference has been settling at A$35,438 at auction. That is A$2,930 more than the hammer, on 38 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16570
|
A$11,943 | A$11,064 | +7.9% In line | 349 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16570 is listed at about A$11,943, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,064 at auction. That is A$878.97 more than the hammer, on 349 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1019
|
A$35,229 | A$32,675 | +7.8% In line | 8 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 1019 is listed at about A$35,229, while the same reference has been settling at A$32,675 at auction. That is A$2,553 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1680
|
A$20,649 | A$19,184 | +7.6% In line | 140 asks · 29 sales strong |
| Rolex 1680 is listed at about A$20,649, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,184 at auction. That is A$1,465 more than the hammer, on 140 asking prices and 29 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5168G010
|
A$132,033 | A$123,056 | +7.3% In line | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5168G010 is listed at about A$132,033, while the same reference has been settling at A$123,056 at auction. That is A$8,977 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5711/1R001
|
A$246,251 | A$230,346 | +6.9% In line | 8 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5711/1R001 is listed at about A$246,251, while the same reference has been settling at A$230,346 at auction. That is A$15,905 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5270G001
|
A$170,213 | A$159,470 | +6.7% In line | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5270G001 is listed at about A$170,213, while the same reference has been settling at A$159,470 at auction. That is A$10,743 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 25600TN
|
A$6,128 | A$5,755 | +6.5% In line | 28 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Tudor 25600TN is listed at about A$6,128, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,755 at auction. That is A$373.21 more than the hammer, on 28 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5205G013
|
A$65,225 | A$61,528 | +6.0% In line | 8 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5205G013 is listed at about A$65,225, while the same reference has been settling at A$61,528 at auction. That is A$3,697 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116610LV
|
A$28,183 | A$26,648 | +5.8% In line | 107 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116610LV is listed at about A$28,183, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,648 at auction. That is A$1,535 more than the hammer, on 107 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17000
|
A$7,464 | A$7,060 | +5.7% In line | 12 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 17000 is listed at about A$7,464, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,060 at auction. That is A$404.60 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 9 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16800
|
A$13,952 | A$13,205 | +5.7% In line | 57 asks · 15 sales strong |
| Rolex 16800 is listed at about A$13,952, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,205 at auction. That is A$746.43 more than the hammer, on 57 asking prices and 15 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Cartier
Ref. WSSA0046
|
A$11,737 | A$11,127 | +5.5% In line | 10 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Cartier WSSA0046 is listed at about A$11,737, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,127 at auction. That is A$610.39 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 6002
|
A$5,651 | A$5,358 | +5.5% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 6002 is listed at about A$5,651, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,358 at auction. That is A$292.99 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5270P014
|
A$242,449 | A$230,346 | +5.3% In line | 4 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5270P014 is listed at about A$242,449, while the same reference has been settling at A$230,346 at auction. That is A$12,103 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 15400ST
|
A$48,096 | A$45,706 | +5.2% In line | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 15400ST is listed at about A$48,096, while the same reference has been settling at A$45,706 at auction. That is A$2,389 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126711CHNR
|
A$29,787 | A$28,350 | +5.1% In line | 56 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126711CHNR is listed at about A$29,787, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,350 at auction. That is A$1,437 more than the hammer, on 56 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5990/1A001
|
A$167,422 | A$159,470 | +5.0% In line | 8 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5990/1A001 is listed at about A$167,422, while the same reference has been settling at A$159,470 at auction. That is A$7,952 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79030B
|
A$4,918 | A$4,721 | +4.2% In line | 75 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Tudor 79030B is listed at about A$4,918, while the same reference has been settling at A$4,721 at auction. That is A$196.72 more than the hammer, on 75 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700
|
A$202,302 | A$194,908 | +3.8% In line | 9 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 3700 is listed at about A$202,302, while the same reference has been settling at A$194,908 at auction. That is A$7,395 more than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17013
|
A$7,393 | A$7,143 | +3.5% In line | 17 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 17013 is listed at about A$7,393, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,143 at auction. That is A$249.74 more than the hammer, on 17 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM011
|
A$311,398 | A$301,221 | +3.4% In line | 26 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM011 is listed at about A$311,398, while the same reference has been settling at A$301,221 at auction. That is A$10,177 more than the hammer, on 26 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1655
|
A$32,787 | A$31,894 | +2.8% In line | 31 asks · 13 sales fair |
| Rolex 1655 is listed at about A$32,787, while the same reference has been settling at A$31,894 at auction. That is A$892.92 more than the hammer, on 31 asking prices and 13 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116619LB
|
A$54,412 | A$53,157 | +2.4% In line | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116619LB is listed at about A$54,412, while the same reference has been settling at A$53,157 at auction. That is A$1,256 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126660
|
A$20,091 | A$19,644 | +2.3% In line | 118 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 126660 is listed at about A$20,091, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,644 at auction. That is A$446.46 more than the hammer, on 118 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116506
|
A$135,263 | A$132,368 | +2.2% In line | 22 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116506 is listed at about A$135,263, while the same reference has been settling at A$132,368 at auction. That is A$2,894 more than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 18239
|
A$27,206 | A$26,803 | +1.5% In line | 39 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 18239 is listed at about A$27,206, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,803 at auction. That is A$403.21 more than the hammer, on 39 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116503
|
A$30,563 | A$30,122 | +1.5% In line | 58 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116503 is listed at about A$30,563, while the same reference has been settling at A$30,122 at auction. That is A$440.88 more than the hammer, on 58 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16018
|
A$23,125 | A$22,853 | +1.2% In line | 24 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16018 is listed at about A$23,125, while the same reference has been settling at A$22,853 at auction. That is A$272.06 more than the hammer, on 24 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116264
|
A$11,231 | A$11,130 | +0.9% In line | 62 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116264 is listed at about A$11,231, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,130 at auction. That is A$101.15 more than the hammer, on 62 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5164A001
|
A$110,917 | A$110,116 | +0.7% In line | 13 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5164A001 is listed at about A$110,917, while the same reference has been settling at A$110,116 at auction. That is A$801.54 more than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16660
|
A$14,649 | A$14,580 | +0.5% In line | 14 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16660 is listed at about A$14,649, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,580 at auction. That is A$69.76 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 9 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5970P001
|
A$355,773 | A$354,378 | +0.4% In line | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5970P001 is listed at about A$355,773, while the same reference has been settling at A$354,378 at auction. That is A$1,395 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 5500
|
A$5,371 | A$5,358 | +0.3% In line | 40 asks · 11 sales fair |
| Rolex 5500 is listed at about A$5,371, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,358 at auction. That is A$13.95 more than the hammer, on 40 asking prices and 11 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116509
|
A$60,690 | A$61,772 | -1.8% In line | 62 asks · 10 sales fair |
| Rolex 116509 is listed at about A$60,690, while the same reference has been settling at A$61,772 at auction. That is A$1,082 less than the hammer, on 62 asking prices and 10 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5402ST
|
A$78,131 | A$79,735 | -2.0% In line | 13 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Audemars Piguet 5402ST is listed at about A$78,131, while the same reference has been settling at A$79,735 at auction. That is A$1,604 less than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5205G010
|
A$48,134 | A$49,222 | -2.2% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5205G010 is listed at about A$48,134, while the same reference has been settling at A$49,222 at auction. That is A$1,088 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5524G001
|
A$47,436 | A$49,222 | -3.6% In line | 11 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5524G001 is listed at about A$47,436, while the same reference has been settling at A$49,222 at auction. That is A$1,786 less than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16520
|
A$42,788 | A$44,465 | -3.8% In line | 63 asks · 22 sales strong |
| Rolex 16520 is listed at about A$42,788, while the same reference has been settling at A$44,465 at auction. That is A$1,677 less than the hammer, on 63 asking prices and 22 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17014
|
A$10,813 | A$11,281 | -4.2% In line | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 17014 is listed at about A$10,813, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,281 at auction. That is A$468.78 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5066A
|
A$41,158 | A$43,188 | -4.7% In line | 5 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5066A is listed at about A$41,158, while the same reference has been settling at A$43,188 at auction. That is A$2,030 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1002
|
A$5,581 | A$6,139 | -9.1% In line | 21 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 1002 is listed at about A$5,581, while the same reference has been settling at A$6,139 at auction. That is A$558.08 less than the hammer, on 21 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM1103
|
A$417,161 | A$460,691 | -9.5% In line | 21 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM1103 is listed at about A$417,161, while the same reference has been settling at A$460,691 at auction. That is A$43,530 less than the hammer, on 21 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3520
|
A$11,789 | A$13,045 | -9.6% In line | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3520 is listed at about A$11,789, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,045 at auction. That is A$1,256 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126720VTNR
|
A$24,416 | A$27,067 | -9.8% In line | 56 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 126720VTNR is listed at about A$24,416, while the same reference has been settling at A$27,067 at auction. That is A$2,651 less than the hammer, on 56 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126710BLRO
|
A$31,879 | A$35,438 | -10.0% Below auction | 124 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126710BLRO is listed at about A$31,879, while the same reference has been settling at A$35,438 at auction. That is A$3,558 less than the hammer, on 124 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 69178
|
A$10,324 | A$11,608 | -11.1% Below auction | 104 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 69178 is listed at about A$10,324, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,608 at auction. That is A$1,284 less than the hammer, on 104 asking prices and 9 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116520
|
A$30,483 | A$34,280 | -11.1% Below auction | 163 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 116520 is listed at about A$30,483, while the same reference has been settling at A$34,280 at auction. That is A$3,796 less than the hammer, on 163 asking prices and 12 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Piaget
Ref. 9154
|
A$5,162 | A$5,832 | -11.5% Below auction | 4 asks · 6 sales thin |
| Piaget 9154 is listed at about A$5,162, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,832 at auction. That is A$669.69 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 6 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16808
|
A$34,182 | A$38,675 | -11.6% Below auction | 9 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16808 is listed at about A$34,182, while the same reference has been settling at A$38,675 at auction. That is A$4,493 less than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14060M
|
A$12,208 | A$13,812 | -11.6% Below auction | 46 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 14060M is listed at about A$12,208, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,812 at auction. That is A$1,604 less than the hammer, on 46 asking prices and 9 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1601
|
A$6,488 | A$7,445 | -12.9% Below auction | 224 asks · 22 sales strong |
| Rolex 1601 is listed at about A$6,488, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,445 at auction. That is A$957.10 less than the hammer, on 224 asking prices and 22 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16613
|
A$13,603 | A$15,626 | -13.0% Below auction | 214 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16613 is listed at about A$13,603, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,626 at auction. That is A$2,023 less than the hammer, on 214 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6263
|
A$134,636 | A$159,470 | -15.6% Below auction | 38 asks · 19 sales strong |
| Rolex 6263 is listed at about A$134,636, while the same reference has been settling at A$159,470 at auction. That is A$24,834 less than the hammer, on 38 asking prices and 19 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16610LV
|
A$21,308 | A$25,323 | -15.9% Below auction | 66 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 16610LV is listed at about A$21,308, while the same reference has been settling at A$25,323 at auction. That is A$4,015 less than the hammer, on 66 asking prices and 7 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18078
|
A$24,409 | A$29,107 | -16.1% Below auction | 19 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 18078 is listed at about A$24,409, while the same reference has been settling at A$29,107 at auction. That is A$4,698 less than the hammer, on 19 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 118238
|
A$27,381 | A$32,675 | -16.2% Below auction | 58 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 118238 is listed at about A$27,381, while the same reference has been settling at A$32,675 at auction. That is A$5,295 less than the hammer, on 58 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6917
|
A$6,174 | A$7,501 | -17.7% Below auction | 68 asks · 14 sales fair |
| Rolex 6917 is listed at about A$6,174, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,501 at auction. That is A$1,327 less than the hammer, on 68 asking prices and 14 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 1740
|
A$8,546 | A$10,436 | -18.1% Below auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Cartier 1740 is listed at about A$8,546, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,436 at auction. That is A$1,890 less than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Blancpain
Ref. 6595
|
A$4,534 | A$5,542 | -18.2% Below auction | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Blancpain 6595 is listed at about A$4,534, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,542 at auction. That is A$1,007 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16014
|
A$7,555 | A$9,362 | -19.3% Below auction | 101 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16014 is listed at about A$7,555, while the same reference has been settling at A$9,362 at auction. That is A$1,807 less than the hammer, on 101 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800/1
|
A$65,225 | A$80,865 | -19.3% Below auction | 16 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 3800/1 is listed at about A$65,225, while the same reference has been settling at A$80,865 at auction. That is A$15,640 less than the hammer, on 16 asking prices and 6 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16613T
|
A$12,766 | A$16,073 | -20.6% Below auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16613T is listed at about A$12,766, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,073 at auction. That is A$3,307 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116610LN
|
A$15,138 | A$19,187 | -21.1% Below auction | 115 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116610LN is listed at about A$15,138, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,187 at auction. That is A$4,049 less than the hammer, on 115 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 19018
|
A$18,730 | A$23,823 | -21.4% Below auction | 18 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 19018 is listed at about A$18,730, while the same reference has been settling at A$23,823 at auction. That is A$5,092 less than the hammer, on 18 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1803
|
A$16,045 | A$20,526 | -21.8% Below auction | 179 asks · 39 sales strong |
| Rolex 1803 is listed at about A$16,045, while the same reference has been settling at A$20,526 at auction. That is A$4,481 less than the hammer, on 179 asking prices and 39 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1503
|
A$10,464 | A$13,394 | -21.9% Below auction | 16 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 1503 is listed at about A$10,464, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,394 at auction. That is A$2,930 less than the hammer, on 16 asking prices and 7 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116518
|
A$27,904 | A$35,717 | -21.9% Below auction | 27 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116518 is listed at about A$27,904, while the same reference has been settling at A$35,717 at auction. That is A$7,813 less than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6241
|
A$275,550 | A$354,378 | -22.2% Below auction | 8 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 6241 is listed at about A$275,550, while the same reference has been settling at A$354,378 at auction. That is A$78,828 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16013
|
A$7,743 | A$10,129 | -23.6% Below auction | 130 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16013 is listed at about A$7,743, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,129 at auction. That is A$2,386 less than the hammer, on 130 asking prices and 9 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1665
|
A$23,614 | A$31,001 | -23.8% Below auction | 34 asks · 13 sales fair |
| Rolex 1665 is listed at about A$23,614, while the same reference has been settling at A$31,001 at auction. That is A$7,388 less than the hammer, on 34 asking prices and 13 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1802
|
A$32,089 | A$42,525 | -24.5% Below auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 1802 is listed at about A$32,089, while the same reference has been settling at A$42,525 at auction. That is A$10,436 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5740/1G001
|
A$313,917 | A$416,394 | -24.6% Below auction | 5 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5740/1G001 is listed at about A$313,917, while the same reference has been settling at A$416,394 at auction. That is A$102,477 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800
|
A$91,524 | A$123,056 | -25.6% Below auction | 20 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3800 is listed at about A$91,524, while the same reference has been settling at A$123,056 at auction. That is A$31,531 less than the hammer, on 20 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18238
|
A$27,484 | A$37,568 | -26.8% Below auction | 161 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 18238 is listed at about A$27,484, while the same reference has been settling at A$37,568 at auction. That is A$10,084 less than the hammer, on 161 asking prices and 12 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5273
|
A$12,766 | A$17,719 | -28.0% Below auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 5273 is listed at about A$12,766, while the same reference has been settling at A$17,719 at auction. That is A$4,953 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6265
|
A$114,405 | A$159,470 | -28.3% Below auction | 23 asks · 15 sales strong |
| Rolex 6265 is listed at about A$114,405, while the same reference has been settling at A$159,470 at auction. That is A$45,065 less than the hammer, on 23 asking prices and 15 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5970R001
|
A$202,302 | A$283,502 | -28.6% Below auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5970R001 is listed at about A$202,302, while the same reference has been settling at A$283,502 at auction. That is A$81,200 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3940J
|
A$55,110 | A$79,037 | -30.3% Below auction | 13 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3940J is listed at about A$55,110, while the same reference has been settling at A$79,037 at auction. That is A$23,927 less than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16030
|
A$7,391 | A$10,631 | -30.5% Below auction | 86 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 16030 is listed at about A$7,391, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,631 at auction. That is A$3,240 less than the hammer, on 86 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3940
|
A$78,828 | A$115,173 | -31.6% Below auction | 27 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3940 is listed at about A$78,828, while the same reference has been settling at A$115,173 at auction. That is A$36,345 less than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 128238
|
A$71,845 | A$105,476 | -31.9% Below auction | 15 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 128238 is listed at about A$71,845, while the same reference has been settling at A$105,476 at auction. That is A$33,631 less than the hammer, on 15 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18038
|
A$23,021 | A$34,866 | -34.0% Below auction | 155 asks · 32 sales strong |
| Rolex 18038 is listed at about A$23,021, while the same reference has been settling at A$34,866 at auction. That is A$11,845 less than the hammer, on 155 asking prices and 32 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 228206
|
A$91,524 | A$140,635 | -34.9% Below auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 228206 is listed at about A$91,524, while the same reference has been settling at A$140,635 at auction. That is A$49,111 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116505
|
A$53,366 | A$85,051 | -37.3% Far below auction | 22 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116505 is listed at about A$53,366, while the same reference has been settling at A$85,051 at auction. That is A$31,685 less than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5711/1A010
|
A$135,333 | A$228,532 | -40.8% Far below auction | 5 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5711/1A010 is listed at about A$135,333, while the same reference has been settling at A$228,532 at auction. That is A$93,199 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6694
|
A$4,674 | A$7,911 | -40.9% Far below auction | 44 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 6694 is listed at about A$4,674, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,911 at auction. That is A$3,237 less than the hammer, on 44 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800/1A
|
A$43,600 | A$74,050 | -41.1% Far below auction | 14 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3800/1A is listed at about A$43,600, while the same reference has been settling at A$74,050 at auction. That is A$30,450 less than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6305
|
A$67,667 | A$115,173 | -41.3% Far below auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 6305 is listed at about A$67,667, while the same reference has been settling at A$115,173 at auction. That is A$47,506 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16234
|
A$9,069 | A$15,497 | -41.5% Far below auction | 167 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16234 is listed at about A$9,069, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,497 at auction. That is A$6,428 less than the hammer, on 167 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5575G001
|
A$118,591 | A$203,767 | -41.8% Far below auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5575G001 is listed at about A$118,591, while the same reference has been settling at A$203,767 at auction. That is A$85,176 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 118239
|
A$28,287 | A$49,111 | -42.4% Far below auction | 32 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 118239 is listed at about A$28,287, while the same reference has been settling at A$49,111 at auction. That is A$20,823 less than the hammer, on 32 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116519
|
A$41,122 | A$71,678 | -42.6% Far below auction | 52 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 116519 is listed at about A$41,122, while the same reference has been settling at A$71,678 at auction. That is A$30,555 less than the hammer, on 52 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16528
|
A$53,715 | A$95,919 | -44.0% Far below auction | 29 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 16528 is listed at about A$53,715, while the same reference has been settling at A$95,919 at auction. That is A$42,204 less than the hammer, on 29 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16550
|
A$16,742 | A$30,834 | -45.7% Far below auction | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16550 is listed at about A$16,742, while the same reference has been settling at A$30,834 at auction. That is A$14,092 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18039
|
A$27,761 | A$52,494 | -47.1% Far below auction | 16 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 18039 is listed at about A$27,761, while the same reference has been settling at A$52,494 at auction. That is A$24,733 less than the hammer, on 16 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 124300
|
A$13,673 | A$26,369 | -48.2% Far below auction | 175 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 124300 is listed at about A$13,673, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,369 at auction. That is A$12,696 less than the hammer, on 175 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79030N
|
A$5,546 | A$10,743 | -48.4% Far below auction | 60 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Tudor 79030N is listed at about A$5,546, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,743 at auction. That is A$5,197 less than the hammer, on 60 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 25407N
|
A$6,380 | A$13,697 | -53.4% Far below auction | 22 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Tudor 25407N is listed at about A$6,380, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,697 at auction. That is A$7,318 less than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14000
|
A$6,488 | A$15,347 | -57.7% Far below auction | 153 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 14000 is listed at about A$6,488, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,347 at auction. That is A$8,859 less than the hammer, on 153 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1625
|
A$7,325 | A$19,532 | -62.5% Far below auction | 19 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 1625 is listed at about A$7,325, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,532 at auction. That is A$12,207 less than the hammer, on 19 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79360N
|
A$6,278 | A$22,853 | -72.5% Far below auction | 56 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Tudor 79360N is listed at about A$6,278, while the same reference has been settling at A$22,853 at auction. That is A$16,575 less than the hammer, on 56 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Medians, not averages, so one exceptional example cannot move a figure. Every pair needs at least three asking prices and three sales, brand must match, and only USD auction results within three years are counted. Last rebuilt 24 Aug 2026.