How to read this. The gap is the median asking price against the
median price actually paid at auction over the last three years, for the
same reference and the same brand. A large positive gap means sellers ask
far more than the hammer supports. A negative gap means recent auction
results have run ahead of what dealers are asking.
What it is not. Auction and retail are different markets: retail
carries warranty, service and recourse that a hammer price does not, so
some premium is normal. Treat this as a question to ask, not an answer.
Show me
Brand
Budget, what it sells for
Evidence
| Watch | Asking, median | Sold, median | Gap | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rolex
Ref. 6105
|
$12,000 | $3,616 | +231.9% Far above auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 6105 is listed at about $12,000, while the same reference has been settling at $3,616 at auction. That is $8,384 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 5512
|
$43,000 | $13,310 | +223.1% Far above auction | 12 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 5512 is listed at about $43,000, while the same reference has been settling at $13,310 at auction. That is $29,690 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 9 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 5508
|
$45,000 | $15,400 | +192.2% Far above auction | 3 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 5508 is listed at about $45,000, while the same reference has been settling at $15,400 at auction. That is $29,600 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 5 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1579
|
$150,000 | $68,580 | +118.7% Far above auction | 3 asks · 6 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1579 is listed at about $150,000, while the same reference has been settling at $68,580 at auction. That is $81,420 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 6 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6238
|
$121,000 | $57,150 | +111.7% Far above auction | 6 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 6238 is listed at about $121,000, while the same reference has been settling at $57,150 at auction. That is $63,850 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 12 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1463
|
$300,000 | $152,400 | +96.9% Well above auction | 3 asks · 7 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1463 is listed at about $300,000, while the same reference has been settling at $152,400 at auction. That is $147,600 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 7 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 4100ST
|
$34,000 | $18,700 | +81.8% Well above auction | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 4100ST is listed at about $34,000, while the same reference has been settling at $18,700 at auction. That is $15,300 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116508
|
$71,000 | $40,640 | +74.7% Well above auction | 35 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116508 is listed at about $71,000, while the same reference has been settling at $40,640 at auction. That is $30,360 more than the hammer, on 35 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1007
|
$3,345 | $1,920 | +74.2% Well above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 1007 is listed at about $3,345, while the same reference has been settling at $1,920 at auction. That is $1,425 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
IWC
Ref. 3714
|
$4,900 | $2,860 | +71.3% Well above auction | 11 asks · 3 sales thin |
| IWC 3714 is listed at about $4,900, while the same reference has been settling at $2,860 at auction. That is $2,040 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 69173
|
$4,375 | $2,560 | +70.9% Well above auction | 214 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 69173 is listed at about $4,375, while the same reference has been settling at $2,560 at auction. That is $1,815 more than the hammer, on 214 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Grand Seiko
Ref. SBGM239
|
$5,450 | $3,218 | +69.4% Well above auction | 4 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Grand Seiko SBGM239 is listed at about $5,450, while the same reference has been settling at $3,218 at auction. That is $2,233 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79280
|
$4,650 | $2,746 | +69.3% Well above auction | 27 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Tudor 79280 is listed at about $4,650, while the same reference has been settling at $2,746 at auction. That is $1,904 more than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 56175ST
|
$18,000 | $11,550 | +55.8% Well above auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 56175ST is listed at about $18,000, while the same reference has been settling at $11,550 at auction. That is $6,450 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 78086
|
$11,950 | $7,680 | +55.6% Well above auction | 5 asks · 9 sales thin |
| Cartier 78086 is listed at about $11,950, while the same reference has been settling at $7,680 at auction. That is $4,270 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 9 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Zenith
Ref. 03.3100.3600/21.M3100
|
$9,109 | $6,050 | +50.6% Well above auction | 18 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Zenith 03.3100.3600/21.M3100 is listed at about $9,109, while the same reference has been settling at $6,050 at auction. That is $3,059 more than the hammer, on 18 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5402BA
|
$98,500 | $66,855 | +47.3% Well above auction | 8 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Audemars Piguet 5402BA is listed at about $98,500, while the same reference has been settling at $66,855 at auction. That is $31,645 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 6 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700/1A
|
$143,127 | $97,629 | +46.6% Well above auction | 4 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3700/1A is listed at about $143,127, while the same reference has been settling at $97,629 at auction. That is $45,498 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6239
|
$115,000 | $78,675 | +46.2% Well above auction | 21 asks · 18 sales strong |
| Rolex 6239 is listed at about $115,000, while the same reference has been settling at $78,675 at auction. That is $36,325 more than the hammer, on 21 asking prices and 18 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16203
|
$7,363 | $5,120 | +43.8% Well above auction | 12 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16203 is listed at about $7,363, while the same reference has been settling at $5,120 at auction. That is $2,243 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 7928
|
$11,150 | $7,796 | +43.0% Well above auction | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Tudor 7928 is listed at about $11,150, while the same reference has been settling at $7,796 at auction. That is $3,354 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126300
|
$10,800 | $7,560 | +42.9% Well above auction | 337 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126300 is listed at about $10,800, while the same reference has been settling at $7,560 at auction. That is $3,240 more than the hammer, on 337 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5070P001
|
$215,000 | $152,900 | +40.6% Well above auction | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5070P001 is listed at about $215,000, while the same reference has been settling at $152,900 at auction. That is $62,100 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1501
|
$3,599 | $2,586 | +39.2% Above auction | 27 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 1501 is listed at about $3,599, while the same reference has been settling at $2,586 at auction. That is $1,014 more than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 6 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6234
|
$42,000 | $30,480 | +37.8% Above auction | 5 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 6234 is listed at about $42,000, while the same reference has been settling at $30,480 at auction. That is $11,520 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1016
|
$18,500 | $14,079 | +31.4% Above auction | 58 asks · 18 sales strong |
| Rolex 1016 is listed at about $18,500, while the same reference has been settling at $14,079 at auction. That is $4,421 more than the hammer, on 58 asking prices and 18 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5980/1A014
|
$107,030 | $81,900 | +30.7% Above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5980/1A014 is listed at about $107,030, while the same reference has been settling at $81,900 at auction. That is $25,130 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM010
|
$130,996 | $100,800 | +30.0% Above auction | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM010 is listed at about $130,996, while the same reference has been settling at $100,800 at auction. That is $30,196 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16220
|
$5,925 | $4,565 | +29.8% Above auction | 111 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16220 is listed at about $5,925, while the same reference has been settling at $4,565 at auction. That is $1,360 more than the hammer, on 111 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116595RBOW
|
$473,000 | $365,400 | +29.5% Above auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116595RBOW is listed at about $473,000, while the same reference has been settling at $365,400 at auction. That is $107,600 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Vacheron Constantin
Ref. 4072
|
$69,000 | $53,340 | +29.4% Above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Vacheron Constantin 4072 is listed at about $69,000, while the same reference has been settling at $53,340 at auction. That is $15,660 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 216570
|
$11,000 | $8,505 | +29.3% Above auction | 204 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 216570 is listed at about $11,000, while the same reference has been settling at $8,505 at auction. That is $2,495 more than the hammer, on 204 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 226570
|
$12,800 | $9,900 | +29.3% Above auction | 142 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 226570 is listed at about $12,800, while the same reference has been settling at $9,900 at auction. That is $2,900 more than the hammer, on 142 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5960P001
|
$48,750 | $37,800 | +29.0% Above auction | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5960P001 is listed at about $48,750, while the same reference has been settling at $37,800 at auction. That is $10,950 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 8880
|
$7,375 | $5,760 | +28.0% Above auction | 10 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 8880 is listed at about $7,375, while the same reference has been settling at $5,760 at auction. That is $1,615 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 56303ST
|
$15,475 | $12,100 | +27.9% Above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 56303ST is listed at about $15,475, while the same reference has been settling at $12,100 at auction. That is $3,375 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Omega
Ref. 3570.50
|
$4,500 | $3,520 | +27.8% Above auction | 84 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Omega 3570.50 is listed at about $4,500, while the same reference has been settling at $3,520 at auction. That is $980.00 more than the hammer, on 84 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Vacheron Constantin
Ref. 4600E/000AB487
|
$12,860 | $10,080 | +27.6% Above auction | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Vacheron Constantin 4600E/000AB487 is listed at about $12,860, while the same reference has been settling at $10,080 at auction. That is $2,780 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16610
|
$9,800 | $7,701 | +27.3% Above auction | 234 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16610 is listed at about $9,800, while the same reference has been settling at $7,701 at auction. That is $2,100 more than the hammer, on 234 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 2510
|
$3,075 | $2,432 | +26.4% Above auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Cartier 2510 is listed at about $3,075, while the same reference has been settling at $2,432 at auction. That is $643.00 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3548
|
$10,500 | $8,320 | +26.2% Above auction | 13 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3548 is listed at about $10,500, while the same reference has been settling at $8,320 at auction. That is $2,180 more than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126600
|
$13,800 | $11,000 | +25.5% Above auction | 142 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 126600 is listed at about $13,800, while the same reference has been settling at $11,000 at auction. That is $2,800 more than the hammer, on 142 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1675
|
$17,500 | $14,080 | +24.3% Above auction | 129 asks · 43 sales strong |
| Rolex 1675 is listed at about $17,500, while the same reference has been settling at $14,080 at auction. That is $3,420 more than the hammer, on 129 asking prices and 43 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16700
|
$12,875 | $10,450 | +23.2% Above auction | 93 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16700 is listed at about $12,875, while the same reference has been settling at $10,450 at auction. That is $2,425 more than the hammer, on 93 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116500LN
|
$29,400 | $23,925 | +22.9% Above auction | 114 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 116500LN is listed at about $29,400, while the same reference has been settling at $23,925 at auction. That is $5,475 more than the hammer, on 114 asking prices and 6 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16233
|
$6,500 | $5,292 | +22.8% Above auction | 296 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16233 is listed at about $6,500, while the same reference has been settling at $5,292 at auction. That is $1,208 more than the hammer, on 296 asking prices and 9 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Omega
Ref. 210.90.42.20.01.001
|
$8,748 | $7,150 | +22.3% Above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Omega 210.90.42.20.01.001 is listed at about $8,748, while the same reference has been settling at $7,150 at auction. That is $1,598 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126200
|
$9,200 | $7,620 | +20.7% Above auction | 173 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126200 is listed at about $9,200, while the same reference has been settling at $7,620 at auction. That is $1,580 more than the hammer, on 173 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 2526
|
$95,000 | $79,125 | +20.1% Above auction | 11 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 2526 is listed at about $95,000, while the same reference has been settling at $79,125 at auction. That is $15,875 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 12 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5726A001
|
$82,800 | $69,300 | +19.5% Above auction | 10 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5726A001 is listed at about $82,800, while the same reference has been settling at $69,300 at auction. That is $13,500 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 228239
|
$46,500 | $39,060 | +19.1% Above auction | 29 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 228239 is listed at about $46,500, while the same reference has been settling at $39,060 at auction. That is $7,440 more than the hammer, on 29 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1603
|
$4,395 | $3,710 | +18.5% Above auction | 93 asks · 10 sales fair |
| Rolex 1603 is listed at about $4,395, while the same reference has been settling at $3,710 at auction. That is $685.00 more than the hammer, on 93 asking prices and 10 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5065A001
|
$45,000 | $38,100 | +18.1% Above auction | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5065A001 is listed at about $45,000, while the same reference has been settling at $38,100 at auction. That is $6,900 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 114060
|
$11,800 | $10,065 | +17.2% Above auction | 148 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 114060 is listed at about $11,800, while the same reference has been settling at $10,065 at auction. That is $1,735 more than the hammer, on 148 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1500
|
$3,800 | $3,245 | +17.1% Above auction | 97 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 1500 is listed at about $3,800, while the same reference has been settling at $3,245 at auction. That is $555.00 more than the hammer, on 97 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 5513
|
$12,500 | $10,739 | +16.4% Above auction | 132 asks · 28 sales strong |
| Rolex 5513 is listed at about $12,500, while the same reference has been settling at $10,739 at auction. That is $1,761 more than the hammer, on 132 asking prices and 28 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5212A001
|
$40,900 | $35,280 | +15.9% Above auction | 12 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5212A001 is listed at about $40,900, while the same reference has been settling at $35,280 at auction. That is $5,620 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126710BLNR
|
$18,999 | $16,415 | +15.7% Above auction | 179 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 126710BLNR is listed at about $18,999, while the same reference has been settling at $16,415 at auction. That is $2,584 more than the hammer, on 179 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 326934
|
$21,450 | $18,554 | +15.6% Above auction | 80 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 326934 is listed at about $21,450, while the same reference has been settling at $18,554 at auction. That is $2,896 more than the hammer, on 80 asking prices and 6 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16718
|
$27,750 | $24,130 | +15.0% Above auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16718 is listed at about $27,750, while the same reference has been settling at $24,130 at auction. That is $3,620 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16710
|
$13,500 | $11,825 | +14.2% In line | 212 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 16710 is listed at about $13,500, while the same reference has been settling at $11,825 at auction. That is $1,675 more than the hammer, on 212 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5905/1A001
|
$57,830 | $50,800 | +13.8% In line | 11 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5905/1A001 is listed at about $57,830, while the same reference has been settling at $50,800 at auction. That is $7,030 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5522A001
|
$48,000 | $42,385 | +13.3% In line | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5522A001 is listed at about $48,000, while the same reference has been settling at $42,385 at auction. That is $5,615 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16750
|
$12,950 | $11,488 | +12.7% In line | 45 asks · 10 sales fair |
| Rolex 16750 is listed at about $12,950, while the same reference has been settling at $11,488 at auction. That is $1,462 more than the hammer, on 45 asking prices and 10 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6542
|
$53,998 | $48,260 | +11.9% In line | 4 asks · 7 sales thin |
| Rolex 6542 is listed at about $53,998, while the same reference has been settling at $48,260 at auction. That is $5,738 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 5850
|
$5,675 | $5,120 | +10.8% In line | 12 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 5850 is listed at about $5,675, while the same reference has been settling at $5,120 at auction. That is $555.00 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116710LN
|
$12,750 | $11,550 | +10.4% In line | 130 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116710LN is listed at about $12,750, while the same reference has been settling at $11,550 at auction. That is $1,200 more than the hammer, on 130 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
H. Moser
Ref. 62001200
|
$22,400 | $20,320 | +10.2% In line | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| H. Moser 62001200 is listed at about $22,400, while the same reference has been settling at $20,320 at auction. That is $2,080 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5236P001
|
$105,000 | $95,250 | +10.2% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5236P001 is listed at about $105,000, while the same reference has been settling at $95,250 at auction. That is $9,750 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116400GV
|
$11,900 | $10,795 | +10.2% In line | 150 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116400GV is listed at about $11,900, while the same reference has been settling at $10,795 at auction. That is $1,105 more than the hammer, on 150 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116688
|
$36,000 | $33,020 | +9.0% In line | 13 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116688 is listed at about $36,000, while the same reference has been settling at $33,020 at auction. That is $2,980 more than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3604
|
$21,000 | $19,294 | +8.8% In line | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3604 is listed at about $21,000, while the same reference has been settling at $19,294 at auction. That is $1,706 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700/1
|
$138,000 | $127,250 | +8.5% In line | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3700/1 is listed at about $138,000, while the same reference has been settling at $127,250 at auction. That is $10,750 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16618
|
$27,500 | $25,400 | +8.3% In line | 38 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 16618 is listed at about $27,500, while the same reference has been settling at $25,400 at auction. That is $2,100 more than the hammer, on 38 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16570
|
$8,560 | $7,930 | +7.9% In line | 349 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16570 is listed at about $8,560, while the same reference has been settling at $7,930 at auction. That is $630.00 more than the hammer, on 349 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1019
|
$25,250 | $23,420 | +7.8% In line | 8 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 1019 is listed at about $25,250, while the same reference has been settling at $23,420 at auction. That is $1,830 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1680
|
$14,800 | $13,750 | +7.6% In line | 140 asks · 29 sales strong |
| Rolex 1680 is listed at about $14,800, while the same reference has been settling at $13,750 at auction. That is $1,050 more than the hammer, on 140 asking prices and 29 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5168G010
|
$94,635 | $88,200 | +7.3% In line | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5168G010 is listed at about $94,635, while the same reference has been settling at $88,200 at auction. That is $6,435 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5711/1R001
|
$176,500 | $165,100 | +6.9% In line | 8 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5711/1R001 is listed at about $176,500, while the same reference has been settling at $165,100 at auction. That is $11,400 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5270G001
|
$122,000 | $114,300 | +6.7% In line | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5270G001 is listed at about $122,000, while the same reference has been settling at $114,300 at auction. That is $7,700 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 25600TN
|
$4,393 | $4,125 | +6.5% In line | 28 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Tudor 25600TN is listed at about $4,393, while the same reference has been settling at $4,125 at auction. That is $267.50 more than the hammer, on 28 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5205G013
|
$46,750 | $44,100 | +6.0% In line | 8 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5205G013 is listed at about $46,750, while the same reference has been settling at $44,100 at auction. That is $2,650 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116610LV
|
$20,200 | $19,100 | +5.8% In line | 107 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116610LV is listed at about $20,200, while the same reference has been settling at $19,100 at auction. That is $1,100 more than the hammer, on 107 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17000
|
$5,350 | $5,060 | +5.7% In line | 12 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 17000 is listed at about $5,350, while the same reference has been settling at $5,060 at auction. That is $290.00 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 9 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16800
|
$10,000 | $9,465 | +5.7% In line | 57 asks · 15 sales strong |
| Rolex 16800 is listed at about $10,000, while the same reference has been settling at $9,465 at auction. That is $535.00 more than the hammer, on 57 asking prices and 15 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Cartier
Ref. WSSA0046
|
$8,413 | $7,975 | +5.5% In line | 10 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Cartier WSSA0046 is listed at about $8,413, while the same reference has been settling at $7,975 at auction. That is $437.50 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 6002
|
$4,050 | $3,840 | +5.5% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 6002 is listed at about $4,050, while the same reference has been settling at $3,840 at auction. That is $210.00 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5270P014
|
$173,775 | $165,100 | +5.3% In line | 4 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5270P014 is listed at about $173,775, while the same reference has been settling at $165,100 at auction. That is $8,675 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 15400ST
|
$34,473 | $32,760 | +5.2% In line | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 15400ST is listed at about $34,473, while the same reference has been settling at $32,760 at auction. That is $1,713 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126711CHNR
|
$21,350 | $20,320 | +5.1% In line | 56 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126711CHNR is listed at about $21,350, while the same reference has been settling at $20,320 at auction. That is $1,030 more than the hammer, on 56 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5990/1A001
|
$120,000 | $114,300 | +5.0% In line | 8 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5990/1A001 is listed at about $120,000, while the same reference has been settling at $114,300 at auction. That is $5,700 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79030B
|
$3,525 | $3,384 | +4.2% In line | 75 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Tudor 79030B is listed at about $3,525, while the same reference has been settling at $3,384 at auction. That is $141.00 more than the hammer, on 75 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700
|
$145,000 | $139,700 | +3.8% In line | 9 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 3700 is listed at about $145,000, while the same reference has been settling at $139,700 at auction. That is $5,300 more than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17013
|
$5,299 | $5,120 | +3.5% In line | 17 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 17013 is listed at about $5,299, while the same reference has been settling at $5,120 at auction. That is $179.00 more than the hammer, on 17 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM011
|
$223,194 | $215,900 | +3.4% In line | 26 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM011 is listed at about $223,194, while the same reference has been settling at $215,900 at auction. That is $7,294 more than the hammer, on 26 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1655
|
$23,500 | $22,860 | +2.8% In line | 31 asks · 13 sales fair |
| Rolex 1655 is listed at about $23,500, while the same reference has been settling at $22,860 at auction. That is $640.00 more than the hammer, on 31 asking prices and 13 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116619LB
|
$39,000 | $38,100 | +2.4% In line | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116619LB is listed at about $39,000, while the same reference has been settling at $38,100 at auction. That is $900.00 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126660
|
$14,400 | $14,080 | +2.3% In line | 118 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 126660 is listed at about $14,400, while the same reference has been settling at $14,080 at auction. That is $320.00 more than the hammer, on 118 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116506
|
$96,950 | $94,875 | +2.2% In line | 22 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116506 is listed at about $96,950, while the same reference has been settling at $94,875 at auction. That is $2,075 more than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 18239
|
$19,500 | $19,211 | +1.5% In line | 39 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 18239 is listed at about $19,500, while the same reference has been settling at $19,211 at auction. That is $289.00 more than the hammer, on 39 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116503
|
$21,906 | $21,590 | +1.5% In line | 58 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116503 is listed at about $21,906, while the same reference has been settling at $21,590 at auction. That is $316.00 more than the hammer, on 58 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16018
|
$16,575 | $16,380 | +1.2% In line | 24 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16018 is listed at about $16,575, while the same reference has been settling at $16,380 at auction. That is $195.00 more than the hammer, on 24 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116264
|
$8,050 | $7,978 | +0.9% In line | 62 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116264 is listed at about $8,050, while the same reference has been settling at $7,978 at auction. That is $72.50 more than the hammer, on 62 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5164A001
|
$79,500 | $78,926 | +0.7% In line | 13 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5164A001 is listed at about $79,500, while the same reference has been settling at $78,926 at auction. That is $574.50 more than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16660
|
$10,500 | $10,450 | +0.5% In line | 14 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16660 is listed at about $10,500, while the same reference has been settling at $10,450 at auction. That is $50.00 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 9 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5970P001
|
$255,000 | $254,000 | +0.4% In line | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5970P001 is listed at about $255,000, while the same reference has been settling at $254,000 at auction. That is $1,000 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 5500
|
$3,850 | $3,840 | +0.3% In line | 40 asks · 11 sales fair |
| Rolex 5500 is listed at about $3,850, while the same reference has been settling at $3,840 at auction. That is $10.00 more than the hammer, on 40 asking prices and 11 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116509
|
$43,500 | $44,275 | -1.8% In line | 62 asks · 10 sales fair |
| Rolex 116509 is listed at about $43,500, while the same reference has been settling at $44,275 at auction. That is $775.50 less than the hammer, on 62 asking prices and 10 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5402ST
|
$56,000 | $57,150 | -2.0% In line | 13 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Audemars Piguet 5402ST is listed at about $56,000, while the same reference has been settling at $57,150 at auction. That is $1,150 less than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5205G010
|
$34,500 | $35,280 | -2.2% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5205G010 is listed at about $34,500, while the same reference has been settling at $35,280 at auction. That is $780.00 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5524G001
|
$34,000 | $35,280 | -3.6% In line | 11 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5524G001 is listed at about $34,000, while the same reference has been settling at $35,280 at auction. That is $1,280 less than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16520
|
$30,668 | $31,870 | -3.8% In line | 63 asks · 22 sales strong |
| Rolex 16520 is listed at about $30,668, while the same reference has been settling at $31,870 at auction. That is $1,202 less than the hammer, on 63 asking prices and 22 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17014
|
$7,750 | $8,086 | -4.2% In line | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 17014 is listed at about $7,750, while the same reference has been settling at $8,086 at auction. That is $336.00 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5066A
|
$29,500 | $30,955 | -4.7% In line | 5 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5066A is listed at about $29,500, while the same reference has been settling at $30,955 at auction. That is $1,455 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1002
|
$4,000 | $4,400 | -9.1% In line | 21 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 1002 is listed at about $4,000, while the same reference has been settling at $4,400 at auction. That is $400.00 less than the hammer, on 21 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM1103
|
$299,000 | $330,200 | -9.5% In line | 21 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM1103 is listed at about $299,000, while the same reference has been settling at $330,200 at auction. That is $31,200 less than the hammer, on 21 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3520
|
$8,450 | $9,350 | -9.6% In line | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3520 is listed at about $8,450, while the same reference has been settling at $9,350 at auction. That is $900.00 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126720VTNR
|
$17,500 | $19,400 | -9.8% In line | 56 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 126720VTNR is listed at about $17,500, while the same reference has been settling at $19,400 at auction. That is $1,900 less than the hammer, on 56 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126710BLRO
|
$22,850 | $25,400 | -10.0% Below auction | 124 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126710BLRO is listed at about $22,850, while the same reference has been settling at $25,400 at auction. That is $2,551 less than the hammer, on 124 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 69178
|
$7,400 | $8,320 | -11.1% Below auction | 104 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 69178 is listed at about $7,400, while the same reference has been settling at $8,320 at auction. That is $920.00 less than the hammer, on 104 asking prices and 9 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116520
|
$21,849 | $24,570 | -11.1% Below auction | 163 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 116520 is listed at about $21,849, while the same reference has been settling at $24,570 at auction. That is $2,721 less than the hammer, on 163 asking prices and 12 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Piaget
Ref. 9154
|
$3,700 | $4,180 | -11.5% Below auction | 4 asks · 6 sales thin |
| Piaget 9154 is listed at about $3,700, while the same reference has been settling at $4,180 at auction. That is $480.00 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 6 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16808
|
$24,500 | $27,720 | -11.6% Below auction | 9 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16808 is listed at about $24,500, while the same reference has been settling at $27,720 at auction. That is $3,220 less than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14060M
|
$8,750 | $9,900 | -11.6% Below auction | 46 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 14060M is listed at about $8,750, while the same reference has been settling at $9,900 at auction. That is $1,150 less than the hammer, on 46 asking prices and 9 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1601
|
$4,650 | $5,336 | -12.9% Below auction | 224 asks · 22 sales strong |
| Rolex 1601 is listed at about $4,650, while the same reference has been settling at $5,336 at auction. That is $686.00 less than the hammer, on 224 asking prices and 22 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16613
|
$9,750 | $11,200 | -13.0% Below auction | 214 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16613 is listed at about $9,750, while the same reference has been settling at $11,200 at auction. That is $1,450 less than the hammer, on 214 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6263
|
$96,500 | $114,300 | -15.6% Below auction | 38 asks · 19 sales strong |
| Rolex 6263 is listed at about $96,500, while the same reference has been settling at $114,300 at auction. That is $17,800 less than the hammer, on 38 asking prices and 19 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16610LV
|
$15,273 | $18,150 | -15.9% Below auction | 66 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 16610LV is listed at about $15,273, while the same reference has been settling at $18,150 at auction. That is $2,878 less than the hammer, on 66 asking prices and 7 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18078
|
$17,495 | $20,863 | -16.1% Below auction | 19 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 18078 is listed at about $17,495, while the same reference has been settling at $20,863 at auction. That is $3,368 less than the hammer, on 19 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 118238
|
$19,625 | $23,420 | -16.2% Below auction | 58 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 118238 is listed at about $19,625, while the same reference has been settling at $23,420 at auction. That is $3,795 less than the hammer, on 58 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6917
|
$4,425 | $5,376 | -17.7% Below auction | 68 asks · 14 sales fair |
| Rolex 6917 is listed at about $4,425, while the same reference has been settling at $5,376 at auction. That is $951.00 less than the hammer, on 68 asking prices and 14 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 1740
|
$6,125 | $7,480 | -18.1% Below auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Cartier 1740 is listed at about $6,125, while the same reference has been settling at $7,480 at auction. That is $1,355 less than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Blancpain
Ref. 6595
|
$3,250 | $3,972 | -18.2% Below auction | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Blancpain 6595 is listed at about $3,250, while the same reference has been settling at $3,972 at auction. That is $722.00 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16014
|
$5,415 | $6,710 | -19.3% Below auction | 101 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16014 is listed at about $5,415, while the same reference has been settling at $6,710 at auction. That is $1,295 less than the hammer, on 101 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800/1
|
$46,750 | $57,960 | -19.3% Below auction | 16 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 3800/1 is listed at about $46,750, while the same reference has been settling at $57,960 at auction. That is $11,210 less than the hammer, on 16 asking prices and 6 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16613T
|
$9,150 | $11,520 | -20.6% Below auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16613T is listed at about $9,150, while the same reference has been settling at $11,520 at auction. That is $2,370 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116610LN
|
$10,850 | $13,752 | -21.1% Below auction | 115 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116610LN is listed at about $10,850, while the same reference has been settling at $13,752 at auction. That is $2,902 less than the hammer, on 115 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 19018
|
$13,425 | $17,075 | -21.4% Below auction | 18 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 19018 is listed at about $13,425, while the same reference has been settling at $17,075 at auction. That is $3,650 less than the hammer, on 18 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1803
|
$11,500 | $14,712 | -21.8% Below auction | 179 asks · 39 sales strong |
| Rolex 1803 is listed at about $11,500, while the same reference has been settling at $14,712 at auction. That is $3,212 less than the hammer, on 179 asking prices and 39 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1503
|
$7,500 | $9,600 | -21.9% Below auction | 16 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 1503 is listed at about $7,500, while the same reference has been settling at $9,600 at auction. That is $2,100 less than the hammer, on 16 asking prices and 7 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116518
|
$20,000 | $25,600 | -21.9% Below auction | 27 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116518 is listed at about $20,000, while the same reference has been settling at $25,600 at auction. That is $5,600 less than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6241
|
$197,500 | $254,000 | -22.2% Below auction | 8 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 6241 is listed at about $197,500, while the same reference has been settling at $254,000 at auction. That is $56,500 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16013
|
$5,550 | $7,260 | -23.6% Below auction | 130 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16013 is listed at about $5,550, while the same reference has been settling at $7,260 at auction. That is $1,710 less than the hammer, on 130 asking prices and 9 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1665
|
$16,925 | $22,220 | -23.8% Below auction | 34 asks · 13 sales fair |
| Rolex 1665 is listed at about $16,925, while the same reference has been settling at $22,220 at auction. That is $5,295 less than the hammer, on 34 asking prices and 13 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1802
|
$23,000 | $30,480 | -24.5% Below auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 1802 is listed at about $23,000, while the same reference has been settling at $30,480 at auction. That is $7,480 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5740/1G001
|
$225,000 | $298,450 | -24.6% Below auction | 5 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5740/1G001 is listed at about $225,000, while the same reference has been settling at $298,450 at auction. That is $73,450 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800
|
$65,600 | $88,200 | -25.6% Below auction | 20 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3800 is listed at about $65,600, while the same reference has been settling at $88,200 at auction. That is $22,600 less than the hammer, on 20 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18238
|
$19,699 | $26,927 | -26.8% Below auction | 161 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 18238 is listed at about $19,699, while the same reference has been settling at $26,927 at auction. That is $7,228 less than the hammer, on 161 asking prices and 12 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5273
|
$9,150 | $12,700 | -28.0% Below auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 5273 is listed at about $9,150, while the same reference has been settling at $12,700 at auction. That is $3,550 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6265
|
$82,000 | $114,300 | -28.3% Below auction | 23 asks · 15 sales strong |
| Rolex 6265 is listed at about $82,000, while the same reference has been settling at $114,300 at auction. That is $32,300 less than the hammer, on 23 asking prices and 15 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5970R001
|
$145,000 | $203,200 | -28.6% Below auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5970R001 is listed at about $145,000, while the same reference has been settling at $203,200 at auction. That is $58,200 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3940J
|
$39,500 | $56,650 | -30.3% Below auction | 13 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3940J is listed at about $39,500, while the same reference has been settling at $56,650 at auction. That is $17,150 less than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16030
|
$5,298 | $7,620 | -30.5% Below auction | 86 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 16030 is listed at about $5,298, while the same reference has been settling at $7,620 at auction. That is $2,323 less than the hammer, on 86 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3940
|
$56,500 | $82,550 | -31.6% Below auction | 27 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3940 is listed at about $56,500, while the same reference has been settling at $82,550 at auction. That is $26,050 less than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 128238
|
$51,495 | $75,600 | -31.9% Below auction | 15 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 128238 is listed at about $51,495, while the same reference has been settling at $75,600 at auction. That is $24,105 less than the hammer, on 15 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18038
|
$16,500 | $24,990 | -34.0% Below auction | 155 asks · 32 sales strong |
| Rolex 18038 is listed at about $16,500, while the same reference has been settling at $24,990 at auction. That is $8,490 less than the hammer, on 155 asking prices and 32 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 228206
|
$65,600 | $100,800 | -34.9% Below auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 228206 is listed at about $65,600, while the same reference has been settling at $100,800 at auction. That is $35,200 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116505
|
$38,250 | $60,960 | -37.3% Far below auction | 22 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116505 is listed at about $38,250, while the same reference has been settling at $60,960 at auction. That is $22,710 less than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5711/1A010
|
$97,000 | $163,800 | -40.8% Far below auction | 5 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5711/1A010 is listed at about $97,000, while the same reference has been settling at $163,800 at auction. That is $66,800 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6694
|
$3,350 | $5,670 | -40.9% Far below auction | 44 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 6694 is listed at about $3,350, while the same reference has been settling at $5,670 at auction. That is $2,320 less than the hammer, on 44 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800/1A
|
$31,250 | $53,075 | -41.1% Far below auction | 14 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3800/1A is listed at about $31,250, while the same reference has been settling at $53,075 at auction. That is $21,825 less than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6305
|
$48,500 | $82,550 | -41.3% Far below auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 6305 is listed at about $48,500, while the same reference has been settling at $82,550 at auction. That is $34,050 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16234
|
$6,500 | $11,108 | -41.5% Far below auction | 167 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16234 is listed at about $6,500, while the same reference has been settling at $11,108 at auction. That is $4,608 less than the hammer, on 167 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5575G001
|
$85,000 | $146,050 | -41.8% Far below auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5575G001 is listed at about $85,000, while the same reference has been settling at $146,050 at auction. That is $61,050 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 118239
|
$20,275 | $35,200 | -42.4% Far below auction | 32 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 118239 is listed at about $20,275, while the same reference has been settling at $35,200 at auction. That is $14,925 less than the hammer, on 32 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116519
|
$29,475 | $51,375 | -42.6% Far below auction | 52 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 116519 is listed at about $29,475, while the same reference has been settling at $51,375 at auction. That is $21,901 less than the hammer, on 52 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16528
|
$38,500 | $68,750 | -44.0% Far below auction | 29 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 16528 is listed at about $38,500, while the same reference has been settling at $68,750 at auction. That is $30,250 less than the hammer, on 29 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16550
|
$12,000 | $22,101 | -45.7% Far below auction | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16550 is listed at about $12,000, while the same reference has been settling at $22,101 at auction. That is $10,101 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18039
|
$19,898 | $37,625 | -47.1% Far below auction | 16 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 18039 is listed at about $19,898, while the same reference has been settling at $37,625 at auction. That is $17,728 less than the hammer, on 16 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 124300
|
$9,800 | $18,900 | -48.2% Far below auction | 175 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 124300 is listed at about $9,800, while the same reference has been settling at $18,900 at auction. That is $9,100 less than the hammer, on 175 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79030N
|
$3,975 | $7,700 | -48.4% Far below auction | 60 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Tudor 79030N is listed at about $3,975, while the same reference has been settling at $7,700 at auction. That is $3,725 less than the hammer, on 60 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 25407N
|
$4,573 | $9,818 | -53.4% Far below auction | 22 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Tudor 25407N is listed at about $4,573, while the same reference has been settling at $9,818 at auction. That is $5,245 less than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14000
|
$4,650 | $11,000 | -57.7% Far below auction | 153 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 14000 is listed at about $4,650, while the same reference has been settling at $11,000 at auction. That is $6,350 less than the hammer, on 153 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1625
|
$5,250 | $14,000 | -62.5% Far below auction | 19 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 1625 is listed at about $5,250, while the same reference has been settling at $14,000 at auction. That is $8,750 less than the hammer, on 19 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79360N
|
$4,500 | $16,380 | -72.5% Far below auction | 56 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Tudor 79360N is listed at about $4,500, while the same reference has been settling at $16,380 at auction. That is $11,880 less than the hammer, on 56 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Medians, not averages, so one exceptional example cannot move a figure. Every pair needs at least three asking prices and three sales, brand must match, and only USD auction results within three years are counted. Last rebuilt 24 Aug 2026.