How to read this. The gap is the median asking price against the
median price actually paid at auction over the last three years, for the
same reference and the same brand. A large positive gap means sellers ask
far more than the hammer supports. A negative gap means recent auction
results have run ahead of what dealers are asking.
What it is not. Auction and retail are different markets: retail
carries warranty, service and recourse that a hammer price does not, so
some premium is normal. Treat this as a question to ask, not an answer.
| Watch | Asking, median | Sold, median | Gap | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rolex
Ref. 5512
|
A$59,966 | A$18,066 | +231.9% Far above auction | 12 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 5512 is listed at about A$59,966, while the same reference has been settling at A$18,066 at auction. That is A$41,899 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 12 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 5508
|
A$65,544 | A$21,253 | +208.4% Far above auction | 4 asks · 7 sales thin |
| Rolex 5508 is listed at about A$65,544, while the same reference has been settling at A$21,253 at auction. That is A$44,291 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 7 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Franck Muller
Ref. 6850
|
A$18,059 | A$6,560 | +175.3% Far above auction | 3 asks · 8 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 6850 is listed at about A$18,059, while the same reference has been settling at A$6,560 at auction. That is A$11,499 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 8 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1579
|
A$209,183 | A$95,638 | +118.7% Far above auction | 3 asks · 6 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1579 is listed at about A$209,183, while the same reference has been settling at A$95,638 at auction. That is A$113,544 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 6 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6238
|
A$168,741 | A$79,699 | +111.7% Far above auction | 6 asks · 13 sales fair |
| Rolex 6238 is listed at about A$168,741, while the same reference has been settling at A$79,699 at auction. That is A$89,042 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 13 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6085
|
A$20,709 | A$10,041 | +106.3% Far above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 6085 is listed at about A$20,709, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,041 at auction. That is A$10,668 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1463
|
A$418,366 | A$212,530 | +96.9% Well above auction | 3 asks · 7 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1463 is listed at about A$418,366, while the same reference has been settling at A$212,530 at auction. That is A$205,836 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 7 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 25574BA
|
A$15,270 | A$7,907 | +93.1% Well above auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 25574BA is listed at about A$15,270, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,907 at auction. That is A$7,363 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 4100ST
|
A$48,112 | A$26,078 | +84.5% Well above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 4100ST is listed at about A$48,112, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,078 at auction. That is A$22,034 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Omega
Ref. 165.024
|
A$15,480 | A$8,568 | +80.7% Well above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Omega 165.024 is listed at about A$15,480, while the same reference has been settling at A$8,568 at auction. That is A$6,911 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
H. Moser
Ref. 38111200
|
A$121,187 | A$67,498 | +79.5% Well above auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| H. Moser 38111200 is listed at about A$121,187, while the same reference has been settling at A$67,498 at auction. That is A$53,689 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116508
|
A$99,013 | A$56,675 | +74.7% Well above auction | 35 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116508 is listed at about A$99,013, while the same reference has been settling at A$56,675 at auction. That is A$42,339 more than the hammer, on 35 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1007
|
A$4,665 | A$2,678 | +74.2% Well above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 1007 is listed at about A$4,665, while the same reference has been settling at A$2,678 at auction. That is A$1,987 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
IWC
Ref. 3714
|
A$6,833 | A$3,988 | +71.3% Well above auction | 11 asks · 3 sales thin |
| IWC 3714 is listed at about A$6,833, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,988 at auction. That is A$2,845 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 69173
|
A$6,101 | A$3,570 | +70.9% Well above auction | 214 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 69173 is listed at about A$6,101, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,570 at auction. That is A$2,531 more than the hammer, on 214 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6239
|
A$135,272 | A$79,699 | +69.7% Well above auction | 22 asks · 21 sales strong |
| Rolex 6239 is listed at about A$135,272, while the same reference has been settling at A$79,699 at auction. That is A$55,573 more than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 21 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. | ||||
|
Grand Seiko
Ref. SBGM239
|
A$7,600 | A$4,487 | +69.4% Well above auction | 4 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Grand Seiko SBGM239 is listed at about A$7,600, while the same reference has been settling at A$4,487 at auction. That is A$3,113 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79280
|
A$6,485 | A$3,829 | +69.3% Well above auction | 27 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Tudor 79280 is listed at about A$6,485, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,829 at auction. That is A$2,655 more than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1450
|
A$25,799 | A$15,497 | +66.5% Well above auction | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1450 is listed at about A$25,799, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,497 at auction. That is A$10,302 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 7851
|
A$21,616 | A$13,388 | +61.5% Well above auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 7851 is listed at about A$21,616, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,388 at auction. That is A$8,228 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 7928
|
A$17,432 | A$10,872 | +60.3% Well above auction | 11 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Tudor 7928 is listed at about A$17,432, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,872 at auction. That is A$6,560 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 56175ST
|
A$25,102 | A$16,107 | +55.8% Well above auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 56175ST is listed at about A$25,102, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,107 at auction. That is A$8,995 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 78086
|
A$16,665 | A$10,724 | +55.4% Well above auction | 5 asks · 10 sales thin |
| Cartier 78086 is listed at about A$16,665, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,724 at auction. That is A$5,941 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 10 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 2526
|
A$132,482 | A$86,100 | +53.9% Well above auction | 11 asks · 14 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 2526 is listed at about A$132,482, while the same reference has been settling at A$86,100 at auction. That is A$46,383 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 14 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. | ||||
Zenith
Ref. 03.3100.3600/21.M3100
|
A$12,855 | A$8,437 | +52.4% Well above auction | 21 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Zenith 03.3100.3600/21.M3100 is listed at about A$12,855, while the same reference has been settling at A$8,437 at auction. That is A$4,418 more than the hammer, on 21 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1578
|
A$22,313 | A$15,061 | +48.2% Well above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1578 is listed at about A$22,313, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,061 at auction. That is A$7,252 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5402BA
|
A$137,363 | A$93,233 | +47.3% Well above auction | 8 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Audemars Piguet 5402BA is listed at about A$137,363, while the same reference has been settling at A$93,233 at auction. That is A$44,131 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 6 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5320G001
|
A$109,472 | A$74,385 | +47.2% Well above auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5320G001 is listed at about A$109,472, while the same reference has been settling at A$74,385 at auction. That is A$35,087 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700/1A
|
A$199,597 | A$136,149 | +46.6% Well above auction | 4 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3700/1A is listed at about A$199,597, while the same reference has been settling at A$136,149 at auction. That is A$63,449 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 4910/10A011
|
A$15,968 | A$11,027 | +44.8% Well above auction | 6 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 4910/10A011 is listed at about A$15,968, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,027 at auction. That is A$4,940 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16203
|
A$10,267 | A$7,140 | +43.8% Well above auction | 12 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16203 is listed at about A$10,267, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,140 at auction. That is A$3,127 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5167A001
|
A$95,527 | A$66,939 | +42.7% Well above auction | 29 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5167A001 is listed at about A$95,527, while the same reference has been settling at A$66,939 at auction. That is A$28,588 more than the hammer, on 29 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126300
|
A$14,922 | A$10,543 | +41.5% Well above auction | 375 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126300 is listed at about A$14,922, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,543 at auction. That is A$4,379 more than the hammer, on 375 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Franck Muller
Ref. 8880
|
A$11,889 | A$8,479 | +40.2% Well above auction | 12 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Franck Muller 8880 is listed at about A$11,889, while the same reference has been settling at A$8,479 at auction. That is A$3,410 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 6 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1501
|
A$5,019 | A$3,606 | +39.2% Above auction | 27 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 1501 is listed at about A$5,019, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,606 at auction. That is A$1,413 more than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 6 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5070P001
|
A$285,883 | A$213,227 | +34.1% Above auction | 11 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5070P001 is listed at about A$285,883, while the same reference has been settling at A$213,227 at auction. That is A$72,656 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1016
|
A$25,799 | A$19,328 | +33.5% Above auction | 59 asks · 21 sales strong |
| Rolex 1016 is listed at about A$25,799, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,328 at auction. That is A$6,471 more than the hammer, on 59 asking prices and 21 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14270
|
A$9,692 | A$7,287 | +33.0% Above auction | 107 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 14270 is listed at about A$9,692, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,287 at auction. That is A$2,406 more than the hammer, on 107 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6234
|
A$58,571 | A$44,277 | +32.3% Above auction | 5 asks · 8 sales thin |
| Rolex 6234 is listed at about A$58,571, while the same reference has been settling at A$44,277 at auction. That is A$14,294 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 8 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5980/1A014
|
A$149,259 | A$114,214 | +30.7% Above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5980/1A014 is listed at about A$149,259, while the same reference has been settling at A$114,214 at auction. That is A$35,045 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6542
|
A$75,302 | A$57,630 | +30.7% Above auction | 4 asks · 12 sales thin |
| Rolex 6542 is listed at about A$75,302, while the same reference has been settling at A$57,630 at auction. That is A$17,672 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 12 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Piaget
Ref. 7131
|
A$30,297 | A$23,205 | +30.6% Above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Piaget 7131 is listed at about A$30,297, while the same reference has been settling at A$23,205 at auction. That is A$7,091 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM010
|
A$182,681 | A$140,571 | +30.0% Above auction | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM010 is listed at about A$182,681, while the same reference has been settling at A$140,571 at auction. That is A$42,110 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16220
|
A$8,245 | A$6,366 | +29.5% Above auction | 112 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 16220 is listed at about A$8,245, while the same reference has been settling at A$6,366 at auction. That is A$1,879 more than the hammer, on 112 asking prices and 6 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116595RBOW
|
A$659,623 | A$509,569 | +29.5% Above auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116595RBOW is listed at about A$659,623, while the same reference has been settling at A$509,569 at auction. That is A$150,054 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Vacheron Constantin
Ref. 4072
|
A$96,224 | A$74,385 | +29.4% Above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Vacheron Constantin 4072 is listed at about A$96,224, while the same reference has been settling at A$74,385 at auction. That is A$21,839 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5960P001
|
A$68,333 | A$53,132 | +28.6% Above auction | 11 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5960P001 is listed at about A$68,333, while the same reference has been settling at A$53,132 at auction. That is A$15,201 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 228239
|
A$69,728 | A$54,471 | +28.0% Above auction | 49 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 228239 is listed at about A$69,728, while the same reference has been settling at A$54,471 at auction. That is A$15,256 more than the hammer, on 49 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 56303ST
|
A$21,581 | A$16,874 | +27.9% Above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 56303ST is listed at about A$21,581, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,874 at auction. That is A$4,707 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Omega
Ref. 3570.50
|
A$6,275 | A$4,909 | +27.8% Above auction | 84 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Omega 3570.50 is listed at about A$6,275, while the same reference has been settling at A$4,909 at auction. That is A$1,367 more than the hammer, on 84 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Vacheron Constantin
Ref. 4600E/000AB487
|
A$17,934 | A$14,057 | +27.6% Above auction | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Vacheron Constantin 4600E/000AB487 is listed at about A$17,934, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,057 at auction. That is A$3,877 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16610
|
A$13,667 | A$10,739 | +27.3% Above auction | 237 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 16610 is listed at about A$13,667, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,739 at auction. That is A$2,927 more than the hammer, on 237 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Franck Muller
Ref. 5850
|
A$9,936 | A$7,821 | +27.1% Above auction | 16 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Franck Muller 5850 is listed at about A$9,936, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,821 at auction. That is A$2,116 more than the hammer, on 16 asking prices and 8 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 2302
|
A$4,497 | A$3,542 | +27.0% Above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Cartier 2302 is listed at about A$4,497, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,542 at auction. That is A$955.27 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 226570
|
A$17,432 | A$13,806 | +26.3% Above auction | 153 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 226570 is listed at about A$17,432, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,806 at auction. That is A$3,626 more than the hammer, on 153 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Richard Mille
Ref. RM016
|
A$122,232 | A$97,409 | +25.5% Above auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM016 is listed at about A$122,232, while the same reference has been settling at A$97,409 at auction. That is A$24,823 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126600
|
A$19,245 | A$15,340 | +25.5% Above auction | 148 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 126600 is listed at about A$19,245, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,340 at auction. That is A$3,905 more than the hammer, on 148 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16700
|
A$18,007 | A$14,573 | +23.6% Above auction | 94 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16700 is listed at about A$18,007, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,573 at auction. That is A$3,434 more than the hammer, on 94 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16233
|
A$9,065 | A$7,380 | +22.8% Above auction | 298 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16233 is listed at about A$9,065, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,380 at auction. That is A$1,685 more than the hammer, on 298 asking prices and 9 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16618
|
A$38,612 | A$31,628 | +22.1% Above auction | 40 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16618 is listed at about A$38,612, while the same reference has been settling at A$31,628 at auction. That is A$6,983 more than the hammer, on 40 asking prices and 9 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Vacheron Constantin
Ref. 44018
|
A$122,721 | A$101,837 | +20.5% Above auction | 4 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Vacheron Constantin 44018 is listed at about A$122,721, while the same reference has been settling at A$101,837 at auction. That is A$20,883 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16018
|
A$23,115 | A$19,328 | +19.6% Above auction | 24 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 16018 is listed at about A$23,115, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,328 at auction. That is A$3,786 more than the hammer, on 24 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 216570
|
A$15,374 | A$12,889 | +19.3% Above auction | 206 asks · 10 sales fair |
| Rolex 216570 is listed at about A$15,374, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,889 at auction. That is A$2,485 more than the hammer, on 206 asking prices and 10 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 26405CE
|
A$39,745 | A$33,386 | +19.1% Above auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 26405CE is listed at about A$39,745, while the same reference has been settling at A$33,386 at auction. That is A$6,359 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5402ST
|
A$94,830 | A$79,699 | +19.0% Above auction | 14 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Audemars Piguet 5402ST is listed at about A$94,830, while the same reference has been settling at A$79,699 at auction. That is A$15,131 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 8 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116622
|
A$18,408 | A$15,476 | +19.0% Above auction | 65 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116622 is listed at about A$18,408, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,476 at auction. That is A$2,932 more than the hammer, on 65 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5270P014
|
A$273,025 | A$230,241 | +18.6% Above auction | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5270P014 is listed at about A$273,025, while the same reference has been settling at A$230,241 at auction. That is A$42,785 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 9411/0
|
A$12,551 | A$10,626 | +18.1% Above auction | 8 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Tudor 9411/0 is listed at about A$12,551, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,626 at auction. That is A$1,924 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5065A001
|
A$62,755 | A$53,132 | +18.1% Above auction | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5065A001 is listed at about A$62,755, while the same reference has been settling at A$53,132 at auction. That is A$9,622 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Omega
Ref. 210.90.42.20.01.001
|
A$12,199 | A$10,341 | +18.0% Above auction | 10 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Omega 210.90.42.20.01.001 is listed at about A$12,199, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,341 at auction. That is A$1,858 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1675
|
A$24,405 | A$20,751 | +17.6% Above auction | 129 asks · 66 sales strong |
| Rolex 1675 is listed at about A$24,405, while the same reference has been settling at A$20,751 at auction. That is A$3,654 more than the hammer, on 129 asking prices and 66 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 2510
|
A$4,288 | A$3,659 | +17.2% Above auction | 8 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Cartier 2510 is listed at about A$4,288, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,659 at auction. That is A$628.94 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5146J010
|
A$41,139 | A$35,282 | +16.6% Above auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5146J010 is listed at about A$41,139, while the same reference has been settling at A$35,282 at auction. That is A$5,857 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5212A001
|
A$57,157 | A$49,200 | +16.2% Above auction | 15 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5212A001 is listed at about A$57,157, while the same reference has been settling at A$49,200 at auction. That is A$7,957 more than the hammer, on 15 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5205G013
|
A$71,052 | A$61,500 | +15.5% Above auction | 11 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5205G013 is listed at about A$71,052, while the same reference has been settling at A$61,500 at auction. That is A$9,553 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 5513
|
A$17,432 | A$15,113 | +15.3% Above auction | 133 asks · 38 sales strong |
| Rolex 5513 is listed at about A$17,432, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,113 at auction. That is A$2,318 more than the hammer, on 133 asking prices and 38 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3548
|
A$14,643 | A$12,710 | +15.2% Above auction | 13 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3548 is listed at about A$14,643, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,710 at auction. That is A$1,933 more than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16750
|
A$18,181 | A$15,916 | +14.2% In line | 46 asks · 18 sales strong |
| Rolex 16750 is listed at about A$18,181, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,916 at auction. That is A$2,265 more than the hammer, on 46 asking prices and 18 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126710BLNR
|
A$26,148 | A$22,892 | +14.2% In line | 187 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 126710BLNR is listed at about A$26,148, while the same reference has been settling at A$22,892 at auction. That is A$3,256 more than the hammer, on 187 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1655
|
A$32,772 | A$28,763 | +13.9% In line | 31 asks · 15 sales strong |
| Rolex 1655 is listed at about A$32,772, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,763 at auction. That is A$4,009 more than the hammer, on 31 asking prices and 15 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 326934
|
A$29,913 | A$26,357 | +13.5% In line | 82 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 326934 is listed at about A$29,913, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,357 at auction. That is A$3,556 more than the hammer, on 82 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1603
|
A$6,129 | A$5,407 | +13.4% In line | 93 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 1603 is listed at about A$6,129, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,407 at auction. That is A$721.68 more than the hammer, on 93 asking prices and 12 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5522A001
|
A$66,939 | A$59,108 | +13.3% In line | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5522A001 is listed at about A$66,939, while the same reference has been settling at A$59,108 at auction. That is A$7,830 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5236P001
|
A$149,914 | A$132,831 | +12.9% In line | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5236P001 is listed at about A$149,914, while the same reference has been settling at A$132,831 at auction. That is A$17,083 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5711/1R001
|
A$257,992 | A$229,334 | +12.5% In line | 9 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 5711/1R001 is listed at about A$257,992, while the same reference has been settling at A$229,334 at auction. That is A$28,658 more than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116300
|
A$13,841 | A$12,335 | +12.2% In line | 65 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116300 is listed at about A$13,841, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,335 at auction. That is A$1,506 more than the hammer, on 65 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116400GV
|
A$16,874 | A$15,054 | +12.1% In line | 154 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 116400GV is listed at about A$16,874, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,054 at auction. That is A$1,820 more than the hammer, on 154 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126200
|
A$12,830 | A$11,449 | +12.1% In line | 193 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 126200 is listed at about A$12,830, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,449 at auction. That is A$1,381 more than the hammer, on 193 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5726A001
|
A$108,217 | A$96,642 | +12.0% In line | 11 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5726A001 is listed at about A$108,217, while the same reference has been settling at A$96,642 at auction. That is A$11,575 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116688
|
A$50,894 | A$46,048 | +10.5% In line | 15 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116688 is listed at about A$50,894, while the same reference has been settling at A$46,048 at auction. That is A$4,846 more than the hammer, on 15 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
H. Moser
Ref. 62001200
|
A$31,238 | A$28,337 | +10.2% In line | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| H. Moser 62001200 is listed at about A$31,238, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,337 at auction. That is A$2,901 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 114060
|
A$16,525 | A$14,998 | +10.2% In line | 150 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 114060 is listed at about A$16,525, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,998 at auction. That is A$1,527 more than the hammer, on 150 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700/1
|
A$195,098 | A$177,457 | +9.9% In line | 9 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3700/1 is listed at about A$195,098, while the same reference has been settling at A$177,457 at auction. That is A$17,641 more than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5146G001
|
A$40,442 | A$36,816 | +9.9% In line | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5146G001 is listed at about A$40,442, while the same reference has been settling at A$36,816 at auction. That is A$3,626 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14060
|
A$13,946 | A$12,718 | +9.7% In line | 130 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 14060 is listed at about A$13,946, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,718 at auction. That is A$1,227 more than the hammer, on 130 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3604
|
A$29,286 | A$26,841 | +9.1% In line | 6 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3604 is listed at about A$29,286, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,841 at auction. That is A$2,445 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17013
|
A$7,763 | A$7,140 | +8.7% In line | 20 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 17013 is listed at about A$7,763, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,140 at auction. That is A$623.36 more than the hammer, on 20 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5905/1A001
|
A$81,811 | A$75,271 | +8.7% In line | 12 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5905/1A001 is listed at about A$81,811, while the same reference has been settling at A$75,271 at auction. That is A$6,540 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 2366
|
A$6,206 | A$5,712 | +8.6% In line | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Cartier 2366 is listed at about A$6,206, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,712 at auction. That is A$493.67 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3919J
|
A$15,480 | A$14,280 | +8.4% In line | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3919J is listed at about A$15,480, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,280 at auction. That is A$1,199 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116500LN
|
A$41,279 | A$38,349 | +7.6% In line | 118 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 116500LN is listed at about A$41,279, while the same reference has been settling at A$38,349 at auction. That is A$2,930 more than the hammer, on 118 asking prices and 12 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16520
|
A$42,768 | A$39,848 | +7.3% In line | 63 asks · 26 sales strong |
| Rolex 16520 is listed at about A$42,768, while the same reference has been settling at A$39,848 at auction. That is A$2,920 more than the hammer, on 63 asking prices and 26 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5270G001
|
A$170,135 | A$159,397 | +6.7% In line | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5270G001 is listed at about A$170,135, while the same reference has been settling at A$159,397 at auction. That is A$10,738 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5168G010
|
A$130,983 | A$122,999 | +6.5% In line | 12 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5168G010 is listed at about A$130,983, while the same reference has been settling at A$122,999 at auction. That is A$7,984 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 25600TN
|
A$6,126 | A$5,753 | +6.5% In line | 28 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Tudor 25600TN is listed at about A$6,126, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,753 at auction. That is A$373.04 more than the hammer, on 28 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17000
|
A$7,461 | A$7,056 | +5.7% In line | 12 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 17000 is listed at about A$7,461, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,056 at auction. That is A$404.42 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 9 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16622
|
A$13,210 | A$12,495 | +5.7% In line | 78 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 16622 is listed at about A$13,210, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,495 at auction. That is A$714.71 more than the hammer, on 78 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Cartier
Ref. WSSA0046
|
A$11,749 | A$11,122 | +5.6% In line | 11 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Cartier WSSA0046 is listed at about A$11,749, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,122 at auction. That is A$627.55 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16518
|
A$39,285 | A$37,207 | +5.6% In line | 9 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 16518 is listed at about A$39,285, while the same reference has been settling at A$37,207 at auction. That is A$2,078 more than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6263
|
A$136,666 | A$129,693 | +5.4% In line | 39 asks · 28 sales strong |
| Rolex 6263 is listed at about A$136,666, while the same reference has been settling at A$129,693 at auction. That is A$6,973 more than the hammer, on 39 asking prices and 28 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 15400ST
|
A$48,074 | A$45,686 | +5.2% In line | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 15400ST is listed at about A$48,074, while the same reference has been settling at A$45,686 at auction. That is A$2,388 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Franck Muller
Ref. 2852
|
A$10,982 | A$10,449 | +5.1% In line | 10 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 2852 is listed at about A$10,982, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,449 at auction. That is A$532.72 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5990/1A001
|
A$167,346 | A$159,397 | +5.0% In line | 10 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5990/1A001 is listed at about A$167,346, while the same reference has been settling at A$159,397 at auction. That is A$7,948 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16710
|
A$18,826 | A$18,101 | +4.0% In line | 215 asks · 10 sales fair |
| Rolex 16710 is listed at about A$18,826, while the same reference has been settling at A$18,101 at auction. That is A$725.17 more than the hammer, on 215 asking prices and 10 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700
|
A$202,210 | A$194,819 | +3.8% In line | 9 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 3700 is listed at about A$202,210, while the same reference has been settling at A$194,819 at auction. That is A$7,391 more than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM011
|
A$311,256 | A$301,084 | +3.4% In line | 26 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM011 is listed at about A$311,256, while the same reference has been settling at A$301,084 at auction. That is A$10,172 more than the hammer, on 26 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126711CHNR
|
A$29,286 | A$28,337 | +3.4% In line | 62 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126711CHNR is listed at about A$29,286, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,337 at auction. That is A$948.30 more than the hammer, on 62 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126660
|
A$20,082 | A$19,482 | +3.1% In line | 120 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 126660 is listed at about A$20,082, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,482 at auction. That is A$599.66 more than the hammer, on 120 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116619LB
|
A$54,388 | A$53,132 | +2.4% In line | 9 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116619LB is listed at about A$54,388, while the same reference has been settling at A$53,132 at auction. That is A$1,255 more than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79030B
|
A$4,916 | A$4,832 | +1.7% In line | 75 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Tudor 79030B is listed at about A$4,916, while the same reference has been settling at A$4,832 at auction. That is A$83.67 more than the hammer, on 75 asking prices and 9 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116264
|
A$11,296 | A$11,125 | +1.5% In line | 63 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116264 is listed at about A$11,296, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,125 at auction. That is A$170.83 more than the hammer, on 63 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5524G001
|
A$48,740 | A$48,028 | +1.5% In line | 12 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 5524G001 is listed at about A$48,740, while the same reference has been settling at A$48,028 at auction. That is A$711.22 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116506
|
A$133,876 | A$132,308 | +1.2% In line | 23 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116506 is listed at about A$133,876, while the same reference has been settling at A$132,308 at auction. That is A$1,567 more than the hammer, on 23 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116233
|
A$13,318 | A$13,179 | +1.1% In line | 120 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116233 is listed at about A$13,318, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,179 at auction. That is A$139.46 more than the hammer, on 120 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16800
|
A$13,946 | A$13,806 | +1.0% In line | 57 asks · 17 sales strong |
| Rolex 16800 is listed at about A$13,946, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,806 at auction. That is A$139.46 more than the hammer, on 57 asking prices and 17 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16660
|
A$14,643 | A$14,573 | +0.5% In line | 14 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 16660 is listed at about A$14,643, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,573 at auction. That is A$69.73 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5970P001
|
A$355,611 | A$354,216 | +0.4% In line | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5970P001 is listed at about A$355,611, while the same reference has been settling at A$354,216 at auction. That is A$1,395 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Panerai
Ref. PAM00292
|
A$6,750 | A$6,730 | +0.3% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Panerai PAM00292 is listed at about A$6,750, while the same reference has been settling at A$6,730 at auction. That is A$19.52 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116610LV
|
A$28,378 | A$28,337 | +0.2% In line | 110 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 116610LV is listed at about A$28,378, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,337 at auction. That is A$41.14 more than the hammer, on 110 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 79173
|
A$7,147 | A$7,140 | +0.1% In line | 81 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 79173 is listed at about A$7,147, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,140 at auction. That is A$6.97 more than the hammer, on 81 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6105
|
A$16,735 | A$16,735 | +0.0% In line | 3 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 6105 is listed at about A$16,735, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,735 at auction. That is - more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116680
|
A$26,357 | A$26,357 | +0.0% In line | 28 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116680 is listed at about A$26,357, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,357 at auction. That is - more than the hammer, on 28 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6305
|
A$67,636 | A$67,915 | -0.4% In line | 4 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 6305 is listed at about A$67,636, while the same reference has been settling at A$67,915 at auction. That is A$278.91 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16600
|
A$12,828 | A$12,969 | -1.1% In line | 121 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 16600 is listed at about A$12,828, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,969 at auction. That is A$140.85 less than the hammer, on 121 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5164A001
|
A$114,353 | A$115,819 | -1.3% In line | 15 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5164A001 is listed at about A$114,353, while the same reference has been settling at A$115,819 at auction. That is A$1,466 less than the hammer, on 15 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116509
|
A$60,663 | A$61,744 | -1.8% In line | 63 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 116509 is listed at about A$60,663, while the same reference has been settling at A$61,744 at auction. That is A$1,081 less than the hammer, on 63 asking prices and 12 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5205G010
|
A$48,112 | A$49,200 | -2.2% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5205G010 is listed at about A$48,112, while the same reference has been settling at A$49,200 at auction. That is A$1,088 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16570
|
A$11,958 | A$12,300 | -2.8% In line | 354 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16570 is listed at about A$11,958, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,300 at auction. That is A$341.67 less than the hammer, on 354 asking prices and 9 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116660
|
A$15,480 | A$15,940 | -2.9% In line | 136 asks · 11 sales fair |
| Rolex 116660 is listed at about A$15,480, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,940 at auction. That is A$460.20 less than the hammer, on 136 asking prices and 11 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 118238
|
A$27,368 | A$28,449 | -3.8% In line | 58 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 118238 is listed at about A$27,368, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,449 at auction. That is A$1,081 less than the hammer, on 58 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116710BLNR
|
A$22,208 | A$23,115 | -3.9% In line | 76 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 116710BLNR is listed at about A$22,208, while the same reference has been settling at A$23,115 at auction. That is A$906.46 less than the hammer, on 76 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1680
|
A$20,639 | A$21,483 | -3.9% In line | 140 asks · 39 sales strong |
| Rolex 1680 is listed at about A$20,639, while the same reference has been settling at A$21,483 at auction. That is A$843.70 less than the hammer, on 140 asking prices and 39 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17014
|
A$10,808 | A$11,276 | -4.2% In line | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 17014 is listed at about A$10,808, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,276 at auction. That is A$468.57 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 18239
|
A$27,194 | A$28,449 | -4.4% In line | 39 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 18239 is listed at about A$27,194, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,449 at auction. That is A$1,255 less than the hammer, on 39 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5066A
|
A$41,139 | A$43,168 | -4.7% In line | 5 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5066A is listed at about A$41,139, while the same reference has been settling at A$43,168 at auction. That is A$2,029 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 5500
|
A$5,369 | A$5,676 | -5.4% In line | 41 asks · 13 sales fair |
| Rolex 5500 is listed at about A$5,369, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,676 at auction. That is A$306.80 less than the hammer, on 41 asking prices and 13 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM1103
|
A$432,311 | A$460,481 | -6.1% In line | 23 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM1103 is listed at about A$432,311, while the same reference has been settling at A$460,481 at auction. That is A$28,170 less than the hammer, on 23 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 1280
|
A$18,059 | A$19,635 | -8.0% In line | 6 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Cartier 1280 is listed at about A$18,059, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,635 at auction. That is A$1,576 less than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18078
|
A$24,401 | A$26,566 | -8.2% In line | 20 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 18078 is listed at about A$24,401, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,566 at auction. That is A$2,165 less than the hammer, on 20 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800/1
|
A$67,636 | A$73,800 | -8.4% In line | 17 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 3800/1 is listed at about A$67,636, while the same reference has been settling at A$73,800 at auction. That is A$6,164 less than the hammer, on 17 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116520
|
A$30,680 | A$33,518 | -8.5% In line | 166 asks · 18 sales strong |
| Rolex 116520 is listed at about A$30,680, while the same reference has been settling at A$33,518 at auction. That is A$2,838 less than the hammer, on 166 asking prices and 18 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116503
|
A$30,610 | A$33,462 | -8.5% In line | 59 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116503 is listed at about A$30,610, while the same reference has been settling at A$33,462 at auction. That is A$2,852 less than the hammer, on 59 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 326939
|
A$38,559 | A$42,171 | -8.6% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 326939 is listed at about A$38,559, while the same reference has been settling at A$42,171 at auction. That is A$3,612 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1002
|
A$5,578 | A$6,136 | -9.1% In line | 21 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 1002 is listed at about A$5,578, while the same reference has been settling at A$6,136 at auction. That is A$557.82 less than the hammer, on 21 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 1740
|
A$8,542 | A$9,399 | -9.1% In line | 6 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Cartier 1740 is listed at about A$8,542, while the same reference has been settling at A$9,399 at auction. That is A$857.65 less than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126710BLRO
|
A$32,074 | A$35,422 | -9.5% In line | 128 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126710BLRO is listed at about A$32,074, while the same reference has been settling at A$35,422 at auction. That is A$3,348 less than the hammer, on 128 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 6002
|
A$5,648 | A$6,248 | -9.6% In line | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 6002 is listed at about A$5,648, while the same reference has been settling at A$6,248 at auction. That is A$599.66 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1019
|
A$35,212 | A$38,964 | -9.6% In line | 8 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 1019 is listed at about A$35,212, while the same reference has been settling at A$38,964 at auction. That is A$3,751 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116610LN
|
A$15,201 | A$16,825 | -9.7% In line | 116 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 116610LN is listed at about A$15,201, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,825 at auction. That is A$1,625 less than the hammer, on 116 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 126720VTNR
|
A$24,404 | A$27,054 | -9.8% In line | 64 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 126720VTNR is listed at about A$24,404, while the same reference has been settling at A$27,054 at auction. That is A$2,650 less than the hammer, on 64 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 69178
|
A$10,320 | A$11,557 | -10.7% Below auction | 104 asks · 14 sales fair |
| Rolex 69178 is listed at about A$10,320, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,557 at auction. That is A$1,238 less than the hammer, on 104 asking prices and 14 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16718
|
A$38,699 | A$43,510 | -11.1% Below auction | 8 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 16718 is listed at about A$38,699, while the same reference has been settling at A$43,510 at auction. That is A$4,811 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Piaget
Ref. 9154
|
A$5,160 | A$5,829 | -11.5% Below auction | 4 asks · 6 sales thin |
| Piaget 9154 is listed at about A$5,160, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,829 at auction. That is A$669.38 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 6 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16808
|
A$34,167 | A$38,657 | -11.6% Below auction | 9 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16808 is listed at about A$34,167, while the same reference has been settling at A$38,657 at auction. That is A$4,490 less than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14060M
|
A$12,202 | A$13,806 | -11.6% Below auction | 47 asks · 11 sales fair |
| Rolex 14060M is listed at about A$12,202, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,806 at auction. That is A$1,604 less than the hammer, on 47 asking prices and 11 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Heuer
Ref. 2447
|
A$12,537 | A$14,224 | -11.9% Below auction | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Heuer 2447 is listed at about A$12,537, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,224 at auction. That is A$1,687 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116400
|
A$13,632 | A$15,476 | -11.9% Below auction | 72 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 116400 is listed at about A$13,632, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,476 at auction. That is A$1,844 less than the hammer, on 72 asking prices and 8 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16519
|
A$35,038 | A$39,884 | -12.2% Below auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16519 is listed at about A$35,038, while the same reference has been settling at A$39,884 at auction. That is A$4,846 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1601
|
A$6,485 | A$7,469 | -13.2% Below auction | 224 asks · 26 sales strong |
| Rolex 1601 is listed at about A$6,485, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,469 at auction. That is A$984.55 less than the hammer, on 224 asking prices and 26 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3893
|
A$14,434 | A$16,825 | -14.2% Below auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3893 is listed at about A$14,434, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,825 at auction. That is A$2,392 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16613
|
A$13,597 | A$15,898 | -14.5% Below auction | 215 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 16613 is listed at about A$13,597, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,898 at auction. That is A$2,301 less than the hammer, on 215 asking prices and 6 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6265
|
A$135,969 | A$159,397 | -14.7% Below auction | 27 asks · 14 sales fair |
| Rolex 6265 is listed at about A$135,969, while the same reference has been settling at A$159,397 at auction. That is A$23,428 less than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 14 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3940
|
A$79,838 | A$94,460 | -15.5% Below auction | 28 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 3940 is listed at about A$79,838, while the same reference has been settling at A$94,460 at auction. That is A$14,622 less than the hammer, on 28 asking prices and 6 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116710LN
|
A$17,781 | A$21,253 | -16.3% Below auction | 131 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116710LN is listed at about A$17,781, while the same reference has been settling at A$21,253 at auction. That is A$3,472 less than the hammer, on 131 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 118208
|
A$24,405 | A$29,334 | -16.8% Below auction | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 118208 is listed at about A$24,405, while the same reference has been settling at A$29,334 at auction. That is A$4,930 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5980/1A001
|
A$117,840 | A$141,686 | -16.8% Below auction | 9 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5980/1A001 is listed at about A$117,840, while the same reference has been settling at A$141,686 at auction. That is A$23,847 less than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16610LV
|
A$21,337 | A$25,939 | -17.7% Below auction | 69 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 16610LV is listed at about A$21,337, while the same reference has been settling at A$25,939 at auction. That is A$4,602 less than the hammer, on 69 asking prices and 8 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116523
|
A$20,639 | A$25,102 | -17.8% Below auction | 92 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116523 is listed at about A$20,639, while the same reference has been settling at A$25,102 at auction. That is A$4,463 less than the hammer, on 92 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 19018
|
A$19,524 | A$23,812 | -18.0% Below auction | 21 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 19018 is listed at about A$19,524, while the same reference has been settling at A$23,812 at auction. That is A$4,288 less than the hammer, on 21 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Piaget
Ref. 9706
|
A$16,665 | A$20,528 | -18.8% Below auction | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Piaget 9706 is listed at about A$16,665, while the same reference has been settling at A$20,528 at auction. That is A$3,863 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3520
|
A$11,784 | A$14,573 | -19.1% Below auction | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3520 is listed at about A$11,784, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,573 at auction. That is A$2,789 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16613T
|
A$12,760 | A$16,065 | -20.6% Below auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16613T is listed at about A$12,760, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,065 at auction. That is A$3,305 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1803
|
A$16,037 | A$20,517 | -21.8% Below auction | 179 asks · 49 sales strong |
| Rolex 1803 is listed at about A$16,037, while the same reference has been settling at A$20,517 at auction. That is A$4,479 less than the hammer, on 179 asking prices and 49 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1503
|
A$10,459 | A$13,388 | -21.9% Below auction | 16 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 1503 is listed at about A$10,459, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,388 at auction. That is A$2,929 less than the hammer, on 16 asking prices and 9 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116518
|
A$27,891 | A$35,701 | -21.9% Below auction | 27 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116518 is listed at about A$27,891, while the same reference has been settling at A$35,701 at auction. That is A$7,809 less than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6241
|
A$275,424 | A$354,216 | -22.2% Below auction | 8 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 6241 is listed at about A$275,424, while the same reference has been settling at A$354,216 at auction. That is A$78,792 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 6 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16014
|
A$7,541 | A$9,703 | -22.3% Below auction | 102 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16014 is listed at about A$7,541, while the same reference has been settling at A$9,703 at auction. That is A$2,162 less than the hammer, on 102 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16013
|
A$7,740 | A$10,124 | -23.6% Below auction | 131 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16013 is listed at about A$7,740, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,124 at auction. That is A$2,385 less than the hammer, on 131 asking prices and 9 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3788
|
A$11,366 | A$15,061 | -24.5% Below auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3788 is listed at about A$11,366, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,061 at auction. That is A$3,696 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1802
|
A$32,075 | A$42,506 | -24.5% Below auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 1802 is listed at about A$32,075, while the same reference has been settling at A$42,506 at auction. That is A$10,431 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18038
|
A$23,150 | A$30,811 | -24.9% Below auction | 158 asks · 38 sales strong |
| Rolex 18038 is listed at about A$23,150, while the same reference has been settling at A$30,811 at auction. That is A$7,661 less than the hammer, on 158 asking prices and 38 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 228206
|
A$91,971 | A$122,999 | -25.2% Below auction | 9 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 228206 is listed at about A$91,971, while the same reference has been settling at A$122,999 at auction. That is A$31,029 less than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800
|
A$91,483 | A$122,999 | -25.6% Below auction | 20 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3800 is listed at about A$91,483, while the same reference has been settling at A$122,999 at auction. That is A$31,517 less than the hammer, on 20 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 118205
|
A$28,867 | A$38,964 | -25.9% Below auction | 10 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 118205 is listed at about A$28,867, while the same reference has been settling at A$38,964 at auction. That is A$10,097 less than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18238
|
A$27,577 | A$37,550 | -26.6% Below auction | 164 asks · 14 sales fair |
| Rolex 18238 is listed at about A$27,577, while the same reference has been settling at A$37,550 at auction. That is A$9,973 less than the hammer, on 164 asking prices and 14 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5273
|
A$12,760 | A$17,711 | -28.0% Below auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 5273 is listed at about A$12,760, while the same reference has been settling at A$17,711 at auction. That is A$4,951 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5970R001
|
A$202,210 | A$283,373 | -28.6% Below auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5970R001 is listed at about A$202,210, while the same reference has been settling at A$283,373 at auction. That is A$81,163 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1625
|
A$7,321 | A$10,292 | -28.9% Below auction | 19 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 1625 is listed at about A$7,321, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,292 at auction. That is A$2,970 less than the hammer, on 19 asking prices and 8 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1665
|
A$23,603 | A$33,344 | -29.2% Below auction | 34 asks · 14 sales fair |
| Rolex 1665 is listed at about A$23,603, while the same reference has been settling at A$33,344 at auction. That is A$9,741 less than the hammer, on 34 asking prices and 14 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5740/1G001
|
A$292,856 | A$416,204 | -29.6% Below auction | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5740/1G001 is listed at about A$292,856, while the same reference has been settling at A$416,204 at auction. That is A$123,348 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3940J
|
A$55,085 | A$79,001 | -30.3% Below auction | 13 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3940J is listed at about A$55,085, while the same reference has been settling at A$79,001 at auction. That is A$23,917 less than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16030
|
A$7,388 | A$10,626 | -30.5% Below auction | 88 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16030 is listed at about A$7,388, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,626 at auction. That is A$3,239 less than the hammer, on 88 asking prices and 9 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 128238
|
A$71,467 | A$105,428 | -32.2% Below auction | 58 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 128238 is listed at about A$71,467, while the same reference has been settling at A$105,428 at auction. That is A$33,961 less than the hammer, on 58 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800/1A
|
A$45,323 | A$66,939 | -32.3% Below auction | 15 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3800/1A is listed at about A$45,323, while the same reference has been settling at A$66,939 at auction. That is A$21,616 less than the hammer, on 15 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6917
|
A$6,171 | A$9,155 | -32.6% Below auction | 70 asks · 20 sales strong |
| Rolex 6917 is listed at about A$6,171, while the same reference has been settling at A$9,155 at auction. That is A$2,984 less than the hammer, on 70 asking prices and 20 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116519
|
A$41,104 | A$61,988 | -33.7% Below auction | 52 asks · 11 sales fair |
| Rolex 116519 is listed at about A$41,104, while the same reference has been settling at A$61,988 at auction. That is A$20,884 less than the hammer, on 52 asking prices and 11 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116505
|
A$55,085 | A$85,012 | -35.2% Far below auction | 25 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116505 is listed at about A$55,085, while the same reference has been settling at A$85,012 at auction. That is A$29,927 less than the hammer, on 25 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5711/1A010
|
A$146,428 | A$228,428 | -35.9% Far below auction | 7 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5711/1A010 is listed at about A$146,428, while the same reference has been settling at A$228,428 at auction. That is A$82,000 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16550
|
A$16,735 | A$26,357 | -36.5% Far below auction | 7 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 16550 is listed at about A$16,735, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,357 at auction. That is A$9,622 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Blancpain
Ref. 6595
|
A$4,532 | A$7,448 | -39.2% Far below auction | 5 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Blancpain 6595 is listed at about A$4,532, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,448 at auction. That is A$2,916 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6694
|
A$4,672 | A$7,907 | -40.9% Far below auction | 44 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 6694 is listed at about A$4,672, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,907 at auction. That is A$3,235 less than the hammer, on 44 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16234
|
A$9,065 | A$15,490 | -41.5% Far below auction | 167 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16234 is listed at about A$9,065, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,490 at auction. That is A$6,425 less than the hammer, on 167 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5575G001
|
A$118,537 | A$203,674 | -41.8% Far below auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5575G001 is listed at about A$118,537, while the same reference has been settling at A$203,674 at auction. That is A$85,137 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 118239
|
A$28,275 | A$49,088 | -42.4% Far below auction | 32 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 118239 is listed at about A$28,275, while the same reference has been settling at A$49,088 at auction. That is A$20,814 less than the hammer, on 32 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Piaget
Ref. 9902
|
A$10,459 | A$18,652 | -43.9% Far below auction | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Piaget 9902 is listed at about A$10,459, while the same reference has been settling at A$18,652 at auction. That is A$8,193 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16528
|
A$53,690 | A$95,875 | -44.0% Far below auction | 29 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 16528 is listed at about A$53,690, while the same reference has been settling at A$95,875 at auction. That is A$42,185 less than the hammer, on 29 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5990/1R001
|
A$184,724 | A$336,505 | -45.1% Far below auction | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5990/1R001 is listed at about A$184,724, while the same reference has been settling at A$336,505 at auction. That is A$151,782 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 124300
|
A$13,667 | A$26,357 | -48.2% Far below auction | 183 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 124300 is listed at about A$13,667, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,357 at auction. That is A$12,690 less than the hammer, on 183 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79030N
|
A$5,543 | A$10,738 | -48.4% Far below auction | 60 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Tudor 79030N is listed at about A$5,543, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,738 at auction. That is A$5,195 less than the hammer, on 60 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 3131
|
A$5,857 | A$11,603 | -49.5% Far below auction | 3 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 3131 is listed at about A$5,857, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,603 at auction. That is A$5,746 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 25407N
|
A$6,377 | A$13,691 | -53.4% Far below auction | 22 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Tudor 25407N is listed at about A$6,377, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,691 at auction. That is A$7,314 less than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18039
|
A$27,884 | A$61,988 | -55.0% Far below auction | 17 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 18039 is listed at about A$27,884, while the same reference has been settling at A$61,988 at auction. That is A$34,104 less than the hammer, on 17 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1500
|
A$5,299 | A$12,398 | -57.3% Far below auction | 97 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 1500 is listed at about A$5,299, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,398 at auction. That is A$7,098 less than the hammer, on 97 asking prices and 9 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14000
|
A$6,485 | A$15,340 | -57.7% Far below auction | 153 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 14000 is listed at about A$6,485, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,340 at auction. That is A$8,855 less than the hammer, on 153 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79360N
|
A$6,275 | A$22,843 | -72.5% Far below auction | 57 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Tudor 79360N is listed at about A$6,275, while the same reference has been settling at A$22,843 at auction. That is A$16,567 less than the hammer, on 57 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Figures are recorded in USD and converted to your selected currency. Medians, not averages, so one exceptional example cannot move a figure. Every pair needs at least three asking prices and three sales, brand must match, and only USD auction results within three years are counted. Last rebuilt 28 Aug 2026.