How to read this. The gap is the median asking price against the
median price actually paid at auction over the last three years, for the
same reference and the same brand. A large positive gap means sellers ask
far more than the hammer supports. A negative gap means recent auction
results have run ahead of what dealers are asking.
What it is not. Auction and retail are different markets: retail
carries warranty, service and recourse that a hammer price does not, so
some premium is normal. Treat this as a question to ask, not an answer.
| Watch | Asking, median | Sold, median | Gap | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rolex
Ref. 5512
|
A$60,069 | A$18,097 | +231.9% Far above auction | 12 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 5512 is listed at about A$60,069, while the same reference has been settling at A$18,097 at auction. That is A$41,971 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 12 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 5508
|
A$62,863 | A$21,290 | +195.3% Far above auction | 3 asks · 7 sales thin |
| Rolex 5508 is listed at about A$62,863, while the same reference has been settling at A$21,290 at auction. That is A$41,573 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 7 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1579
|
A$209,543 | A$95,803 | +118.7% Far above auction | 3 asks · 6 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1579 is listed at about A$209,543, while the same reference has been settling at A$95,803 at auction. That is A$113,740 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 6 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6238
|
A$169,031 | A$79,836 | +111.7% Far above auction | 6 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 6238 is listed at about A$169,031, while the same reference has been settling at A$79,836 at auction. That is A$89,195 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 12 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6085
|
A$20,745 | A$10,058 | +106.3% Far above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 6085 is listed at about A$20,745, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,058 at auction. That is A$10,687 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Sellers ask more than double what this reference has fetched at auction. Worth understanding why before paying it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1463
|
A$419,085 | A$212,895 | +96.9% Well above auction | 3 asks · 7 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1463 is listed at about A$419,085, while the same reference has been settling at A$212,895 at auction. That is A$206,190 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 7 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 25574BA
|
A$15,297 | A$7,921 | +93.1% Well above auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 25574BA is listed at about A$15,297, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,921 at auction. That is A$7,376 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 4100ST
|
A$47,496 | A$26,123 | +81.8% Well above auction | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 4100ST is listed at about A$47,496, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,123 at auction. That is A$21,373 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Omega
Ref. 165.024
|
A$15,506 | A$8,583 | +80.7% Well above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Omega 165.024 is listed at about A$15,506, while the same reference has been settling at A$8,583 at auction. That is A$6,923 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116508
|
A$99,183 | A$56,772 | +74.7% Well above auction | 35 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116508 is listed at about A$99,183, while the same reference has been settling at A$56,772 at auction. That is A$42,411 more than the hammer, on 35 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6239
|
A$160,649 | A$92,164 | +74.3% Well above auction | 21 asks · 20 sales strong |
| Rolex 6239 is listed at about A$160,649, while the same reference has been settling at A$92,164 at auction. That is A$68,485 more than the hammer, on 21 asking prices and 20 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1007
|
A$4,673 | A$2,682 | +74.2% Well above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 1007 is listed at about A$4,673, while the same reference has been settling at A$2,682 at auction. That is A$1,991 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
IWC
Ref. 3714
|
A$6,845 | A$3,995 | +71.3% Well above auction | 11 asks · 3 sales thin |
| IWC 3714 is listed at about A$6,845, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,995 at auction. That is A$2,850 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 69173
|
A$6,112 | A$3,576 | +70.9% Well above auction | 214 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 69173 is listed at about A$6,112, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,576 at auction. That is A$2,535 more than the hammer, on 214 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Grand Seiko
Ref. SBGM239
|
A$7,613 | A$4,495 | +69.4% Well above auction | 4 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Grand Seiko SBGM239 is listed at about A$7,613, while the same reference has been settling at A$4,495 at auction. That is A$3,119 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79280
|
A$6,496 | A$3,836 | +69.3% Well above auction | 27 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Tudor 79280 is listed at about A$6,496, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,836 at auction. That is A$2,660 more than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1450
|
A$25,844 | A$15,524 | +66.5% Well above auction | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1450 is listed at about A$25,844, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,524 at auction. That is A$10,320 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 7851
|
A$21,653 | A$13,411 | +61.5% Well above auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 7851 is listed at about A$21,653, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,411 at auction. That is A$8,242 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 56175ST
|
A$25,145 | A$16,135 | +55.8% Well above auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 56175ST is listed at about A$25,145, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,135 at auction. That is A$9,010 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 78086
|
A$16,694 | A$10,743 | +55.4% Well above auction | 5 asks · 10 sales thin |
| Cartier 78086 is listed at about A$16,694, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,743 at auction. That is A$5,951 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 10 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 2526
|
A$132,710 | A$88,008 | +50.8% Well above auction | 11 asks · 13 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 2526 is listed at about A$132,710, while the same reference has been settling at A$88,008 at auction. That is A$44,702 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 13 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. | ||||
Zenith
Ref. 03.3100.3600/21.M3100
|
A$12,724 | A$8,452 | +50.6% Well above auction | 18 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Zenith 03.3100.3600/21.M3100 is listed at about A$12,724, while the same reference has been settling at A$8,452 at auction. That is A$4,273 more than the hammer, on 18 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 1578
|
A$22,351 | A$15,087 | +48.2% Well above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 1578 is listed at about A$22,351, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,087 at auction. That is A$7,264 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5402BA
|
A$137,600 | A$93,393 | +47.3% Well above auction | 8 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Audemars Piguet 5402BA is listed at about A$137,600, while the same reference has been settling at A$93,393 at auction. That is A$44,206 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 6 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700/1A
|
A$199,941 | A$136,383 | +46.6% Well above auction | 4 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3700/1A is listed at about A$199,941, while the same reference has been settling at A$136,383 at auction. That is A$63,558 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 5 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 4910/10A011
|
A$15,995 | A$11,046 | +44.8% Well above auction | 6 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 4910/10A011 is listed at about A$15,995, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,046 at auction. That is A$4,949 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 4 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16203
|
A$10,285 | A$7,152 | +43.8% Well above auction | 12 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16203 is listed at about A$10,285, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,152 at auction. That is A$3,133 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 7928
|
A$15,576 | A$10,891 | +43.0% Well above auction | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Tudor 7928 is listed at about A$15,576, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,891 at auction. That is A$4,685 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126300
|
A$15,087 | A$10,561 | +42.9% Well above auction | 337 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126300 is listed at about A$15,087, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,561 at auction. That is A$4,526 more than the hammer, on 337 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5070P001
|
A$300,344 | A$213,594 | +40.6% Well above auction | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5070P001 is listed at about A$300,344, while the same reference has been settling at A$213,594 at auction. That is A$86,751 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. A wide premium over settled prices, beyond what warranty and service alone usually explain. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1501
|
A$5,028 | A$3,612 | +39.2% Above auction | 27 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 1501 is listed at about A$5,028, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,612 at auction. That is A$1,416 more than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 6 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6234
|
A$58,672 | A$42,579 | +37.8% Above auction | 5 asks · 7 sales thin |
| Rolex 6234 is listed at about A$58,672, while the same reference has been settling at A$42,579 at auction. That is A$16,093 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 7 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1016
|
A$25,844 | A$19,362 | +33.5% Above auction | 59 asks · 21 sales strong |
| Rolex 1016 is listed at about A$25,844, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,362 at auction. That is A$6,482 more than the hammer, on 59 asking prices and 21 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14270
|
A$9,709 | A$7,299 | +33.0% Above auction | 107 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 14270 is listed at about A$9,709, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,299 at auction. That is A$2,410 more than the hammer, on 107 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5980/1A014
|
A$149,516 | A$114,410 | +30.7% Above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5980/1A014 is listed at about A$149,516, while the same reference has been settling at A$114,410 at auction. That is A$35,105 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM010
|
A$182,995 | A$140,813 | +30.0% Above auction | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM010 is listed at about A$182,995, while the same reference has been settling at A$140,813 at auction. That is A$42,182 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16220
|
A$8,259 | A$6,377 | +29.5% Above auction | 112 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 16220 is listed at about A$8,259, while the same reference has been settling at A$6,377 at auction. That is A$1,882 more than the hammer, on 112 asking prices and 6 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116595RBOW
|
A$660,757 | A$510,446 | +29.5% Above auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116595RBOW is listed at about A$660,757, while the same reference has been settling at A$510,446 at auction. That is A$150,312 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Vacheron Constantin
Ref. 4072
|
A$96,390 | A$74,513 | +29.4% Above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Vacheron Constantin 4072 is listed at about A$96,390, while the same reference has been settling at A$74,513 at auction. That is A$21,876 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5960P001
|
A$68,101 | A$52,805 | +29.0% Above auction | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5960P001 is listed at about A$68,101, while the same reference has been settling at A$52,805 at auction. That is A$15,297 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 226570
|
A$17,741 | A$13,830 | +28.3% Above auction | 144 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 226570 is listed at about A$17,741, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,830 at auction. That is A$3,911 more than the hammer, on 144 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 56303ST
|
A$21,618 | A$16,903 | +27.9% Above auction | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 56303ST is listed at about A$21,618, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,903 at auction. That is A$4,715 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Omega
Ref. 3570.50
|
A$6,286 | A$4,917 | +27.8% Above auction | 84 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Omega 3570.50 is listed at about A$6,286, while the same reference has been settling at A$4,917 at auction. That is A$1,369 more than the hammer, on 84 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Vacheron Constantin
Ref. 4600E/000AB487
|
A$17,965 | A$14,081 | +27.6% Above auction | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Vacheron Constantin 4600E/000AB487 is listed at about A$17,965, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,081 at auction. That is A$3,884 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16610
|
A$13,690 | A$10,757 | +27.3% Above auction | 234 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16610 is listed at about A$13,690, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,757 at auction. That is A$2,933 more than the hammer, on 234 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 2302
|
A$4,505 | A$3,548 | +27.0% Above auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Cartier 2302 is listed at about A$4,505, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,548 at auction. That is A$956.91 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Richard Mille
Ref. RM016
|
A$122,443 | A$97,577 | +25.5% Above auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM016 is listed at about A$122,443, while the same reference has been settling at A$97,577 at auction. That is A$24,866 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126600
|
A$19,278 | A$15,366 | +25.5% Above auction | 142 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 126600 is listed at about A$19,278, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,366 at auction. That is A$3,911 more than the hammer, on 142 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16700
|
A$17,986 | A$14,598 | +23.2% Above auction | 93 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16700 is listed at about A$17,986, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,598 at auction. That is A$3,388 more than the hammer, on 93 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1675
|
A$24,447 | A$19,893 | +22.9% Above auction | 129 asks · 56 sales strong |
| Rolex 1675 is listed at about A$24,447, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,893 at auction. That is A$4,554 more than the hammer, on 129 asking prices and 56 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16233
|
A$9,080 | A$7,393 | +22.8% Above auction | 298 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16233 is listed at about A$9,080, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,393 at auction. That is A$1,688 more than the hammer, on 298 asking prices and 9 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116622
|
A$18,440 | A$15,080 | +22.3% Above auction | 65 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116622 is listed at about A$18,440, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,080 at auction. That is A$3,360 more than the hammer, on 65 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 8880
|
A$10,303 | A$8,493 | +21.3% Above auction | 10 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Franck Muller 8880 is listed at about A$10,303, while the same reference has been settling at A$8,493 at auction. That is A$1,809 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 6 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16618
|
A$38,416 | A$31,683 | +21.3% Above auction | 38 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16618 is listed at about A$38,416, while the same reference has been settling at A$31,683 at auction. That is A$6,733 more than the hammer, on 38 asking prices and 9 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126200
|
A$12,852 | A$10,645 | +20.7% Above auction | 173 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126200 is listed at about A$12,852, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,645 at auction. That is A$2,207 more than the hammer, on 173 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 216570
|
A$15,366 | A$12,814 | +19.9% Above auction | 205 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 216570 is listed at about A$15,366, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,814 at auction. That is A$2,553 more than the hammer, on 205 asking prices and 8 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5726A001
|
A$115,667 | A$96,809 | +19.5% Above auction | 10 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5726A001 is listed at about A$115,667, while the same reference has been settling at A$96,809 at auction. That is A$18,859 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6542
|
A$75,432 | A$63,303 | +19.2% Above auction | 4 asks · 10 sales thin |
| Rolex 6542 is listed at about A$75,432, while the same reference has been settling at A$63,303 at auction. That is A$12,129 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 10 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 26405CE
|
A$39,813 | A$33,443 | +19.1% Above auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 26405CE is listed at about A$39,813, while the same reference has been settling at A$33,443 at auction. That is A$6,370 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 228239
|
A$64,958 | A$54,565 | +19.1% Above auction | 29 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 228239 is listed at about A$64,958, while the same reference has been settling at A$54,565 at auction. That is A$10,393 more than the hammer, on 29 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 9411/0
|
A$12,573 | A$10,645 | +18.1% Above auction | 8 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Tudor 9411/0 is listed at about A$12,573, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,645 at auction. That is A$1,928 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5065A001
|
A$62,863 | A$53,224 | +18.1% Above auction | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5065A001 is listed at about A$62,863, while the same reference has been settling at A$53,224 at auction. That is A$9,639 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Omega
Ref. 210.90.42.20.01.001
|
A$12,220 | A$10,358 | +18.0% Above auction | 6 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Omega 210.90.42.20.01.001 is listed at about A$12,220, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,358 at auction. That is A$1,861 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 2510
|
A$4,296 | A$3,666 | +17.2% Above auction | 8 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Cartier 2510 is listed at about A$4,296, while the same reference has been settling at A$3,666 at auction. That is A$630.02 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 114060
|
A$16,484 | A$14,081 | +17.1% Above auction | 148 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 114060 is listed at about A$16,484, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,081 at auction. That is A$2,403 more than the hammer, on 148 asking prices and 5 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5212A001
|
A$57,135 | A$49,284 | +15.9% Above auction | 12 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5212A001 is listed at about A$57,135, while the same reference has been settling at A$49,284 at auction. That is A$7,851 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 3 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 5513
|
A$17,462 | A$15,080 | +15.8% Above auction | 132 asks · 37 sales strong |
| Rolex 5513 is listed at about A$17,462, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,080 at auction. That is A$2,382 more than the hammer, on 132 asking prices and 37 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126710BLNR
|
A$26,542 | A$22,931 | +15.8% Above auction | 181 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 126710BLNR is listed at about A$26,542, while the same reference has been settling at A$22,931 at auction. That is A$3,611 more than the hammer, on 181 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3548
|
A$14,668 | A$12,732 | +15.2% Above auction | 13 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3548 is listed at about A$14,668, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,732 at auction. That is A$1,936 more than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 4 sales. A normal looking retail premium over hammer prices. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5905/1A001
|
A$80,786 | A$70,965 | +13.8% In line | 11 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5905/1A001 is listed at about A$80,786, while the same reference has been settling at A$70,965 at auction. That is A$9,821 more than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16750
|
A$18,091 | A$15,925 | +13.6% In line | 45 asks · 15 sales strong |
| Rolex 16750 is listed at about A$18,091, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,925 at auction. That is A$2,165 more than the hammer, on 45 asking prices and 15 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 326934
|
A$29,965 | A$26,402 | +13.5% In line | 80 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 326934 is listed at about A$29,965, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,402 at auction. That is A$3,562 more than the hammer, on 80 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1603
|
A$6,140 | A$5,417 | +13.4% In line | 93 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 1603 is listed at about A$6,140, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,417 at auction. That is A$722.92 more than the hammer, on 93 asking prices and 12 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5522A001
|
A$67,054 | A$59,210 | +13.3% In line | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5522A001 is listed at about A$67,054, while the same reference has been settling at A$59,210 at auction. That is A$7,844 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16622
|
A$13,233 | A$11,734 | +12.8% In line | 78 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16622 is listed at about A$13,233, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,734 at auction. That is A$1,498 more than the hammer, on 78 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116300
|
A$13,830 | A$12,293 | +12.5% In line | 63 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116300 is listed at about A$13,830, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,293 at auction. That is A$1,537 more than the hammer, on 63 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116400GV
|
A$16,624 | A$14,840 | +12.0% In line | 150 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 116400GV is listed at about A$16,624, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,840 at auction. That is A$1,784 more than the hammer, on 150 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116500LN
|
A$41,070 | A$36,780 | +11.7% In line | 114 asks · 10 sales fair |
| Rolex 116500LN is listed at about A$41,070, while the same reference has been settling at A$36,780 at auction. That is A$4,290 more than the hammer, on 114 asking prices and 10 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16710
|
A$18,859 | A$16,903 | +11.6% In line | 212 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16710 is listed at about A$18,859, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,903 at auction. That is A$1,956 more than the hammer, on 212 asking prices and 9 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
H. Moser
Ref. 62001200
|
A$31,292 | A$28,386 | +10.2% In line | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| H. Moser 62001200 is listed at about A$31,292, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,386 at auction. That is A$2,906 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5236P001
|
A$146,680 | A$133,059 | +10.2% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5236P001 is listed at about A$146,680, while the same reference has been settling at A$133,059 at auction. That is A$13,620 more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14060
|
A$13,970 | A$12,740 | +9.7% In line | 129 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 14060 is listed at about A$13,970, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,740 at auction. That is A$1,229 more than the hammer, on 129 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116688
|
A$50,290 | A$46,127 | +9.0% In line | 13 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116688 is listed at about A$50,290, while the same reference has been settling at A$46,127 at auction. That is A$4,163 more than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3604
|
A$29,336 | A$26,953 | +8.8% In line | 6 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3604 is listed at about A$29,336, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,953 at auction. That is A$2,383 more than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 2366
|
A$6,216 | A$5,722 | +8.6% In line | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Cartier 2366 is listed at about A$6,216, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,722 at auction. That is A$494.52 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700/1
|
A$192,779 | A$177,762 | +8.5% In line | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3700/1 is listed at about A$192,779, while the same reference has been settling at A$177,762 at auction. That is A$15,017 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3919J
|
A$15,506 | A$14,305 | +8.4% In line | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3919J is listed at about A$15,506, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,305 at auction. That is A$1,201 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1655
|
A$32,828 | A$30,373 | +8.1% In line | 31 asks · 14 sales fair |
| Rolex 1655 is listed at about A$32,828, while the same reference has been settling at A$30,373 at auction. That is A$2,455 more than the hammer, on 31 asking prices and 14 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1019
|
A$35,273 | A$32,717 | +7.8% In line | 8 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 1019 is listed at about A$35,273, while the same reference has been settling at A$32,717 at auction. That is A$2,556 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5711/1R001
|
A$246,562 | A$229,728 | +7.3% In line | 8 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 5711/1R001 is listed at about A$246,562, while the same reference has been settling at A$229,728 at auction. That is A$16,833 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5168G010
|
A$132,200 | A$123,211 | +7.3% In line | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5168G010 is listed at about A$132,200, while the same reference has been settling at A$123,211 at auction. That is A$8,989 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126711CHNR
|
A$30,314 | A$28,386 | +6.8% In line | 57 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126711CHNR is listed at about A$30,314, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,386 at auction. That is A$1,928 more than the hammer, on 57 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5270G001
|
A$170,428 | A$159,671 | +6.7% In line | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5270G001 is listed at about A$170,428, while the same reference has been settling at A$159,671 at auction. That is A$10,757 more than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 25600TN
|
A$6,136 | A$5,762 | +6.5% In line | 28 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Tudor 25600TN is listed at about A$6,136, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,762 at auction. That is A$373.68 more than the hammer, on 28 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5205G013
|
A$65,307 | A$61,606 | +6.0% In line | 8 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5205G013 is listed at about A$65,307, while the same reference has been settling at A$61,606 at auction. That is A$3,702 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17000
|
A$7,474 | A$7,069 | +5.7% In line | 12 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 17000 is listed at about A$7,474, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,069 at auction. That is A$405.12 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 9 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16518
|
A$39,352 | A$37,271 | +5.6% In line | 9 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16518 is listed at about A$39,352, while the same reference has been settling at A$37,271 at auction. That is A$2,081 more than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Cartier
Ref. WSSA0046
|
A$11,752 | A$11,141 | +5.5% In line | 10 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Cartier WSSA0046 is listed at about A$11,752, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,141 at auction. That is A$611.17 more than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5270P014
|
A$242,755 | A$230,636 | +5.3% In line | 4 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5270P014 is listed at about A$242,755, while the same reference has been settling at A$230,636 at auction. That is A$12,119 more than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 15400ST
|
A$48,156 | A$45,764 | +5.2% In line | 14 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 15400ST is listed at about A$48,156, while the same reference has been settling at A$45,764 at auction. That is A$2,392 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5990/1A001
|
A$167,633 | A$159,671 | +5.0% In line | 8 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5990/1A001 is listed at about A$167,633, while the same reference has been settling at A$159,671 at auction. That is A$7,962 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79030B
|
A$4,924 | A$4,727 | +4.2% In line | 75 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Tudor 79030B is listed at about A$4,924, while the same reference has been settling at A$4,727 at auction. That is A$196.97 more than the hammer, on 75 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3700
|
A$202,558 | A$195,154 | +3.8% In line | 9 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 3700 is listed at about A$202,558, while the same reference has been settling at A$195,154 at auction. That is A$7,404 more than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17013
|
A$7,402 | A$7,152 | +3.5% In line | 17 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 17013 is listed at about A$7,402, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,152 at auction. That is A$250.05 more than the hammer, on 17 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM011
|
A$311,791 | A$301,602 | +3.4% In line | 26 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM011 is listed at about A$311,791, while the same reference has been settling at A$301,602 at auction. That is A$10,189 more than the hammer, on 26 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126660
|
A$19,976 | A$19,515 | +2.4% In line | 119 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 126660 is listed at about A$19,976, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,515 at auction. That is A$460.99 more than the hammer, on 119 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116619LB
|
A$54,481 | A$53,224 | +2.4% In line | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116619LB is listed at about A$54,481, while the same reference has been settling at A$53,224 at auction. That is A$1,257 more than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116400
|
A$13,620 | A$13,306 | +2.4% In line | 71 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116400 is listed at about A$13,620, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,306 at auction. That is A$314.31 more than the hammer, on 71 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116506
|
A$135,434 | A$132,536 | +2.2% In line | 22 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116506 is listed at about A$135,434, while the same reference has been settling at A$132,536 at auction. That is A$2,898 more than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116503
|
A$30,602 | A$30,160 | +1.5% In line | 58 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116503 is listed at about A$30,602, while the same reference has been settling at A$30,160 at auction. That is A$441.44 more than the hammer, on 58 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 5850
|
A$7,928 | A$7,834 | +1.2% In line | 12 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Franck Muller 5850 is listed at about A$7,928, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,834 at auction. That is A$93.60 more than the hammer, on 12 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16018
|
A$23,154 | A$22,882 | +1.2% In line | 24 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16018 is listed at about A$23,154, while the same reference has been settling at A$22,882 at auction. That is A$272.41 more than the hammer, on 24 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16800
|
A$13,970 | A$13,830 | +1.0% In line | 57 asks · 17 sales strong |
| Rolex 16800 is listed at about A$13,970, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,830 at auction. That is A$139.70 more than the hammer, on 57 asking prices and 17 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116264
|
A$11,245 | A$11,144 | +0.9% In line | 62 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116264 is listed at about A$11,245, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,144 at auction. That is A$101.28 more than the hammer, on 62 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5164A001
|
A$111,058 | A$110,255 | +0.7% In line | 13 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5164A001 is listed at about A$111,058, while the same reference has been settling at A$110,255 at auction. That is A$802.55 more than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6263
|
A$134,806 | A$134,107 | +0.5% In line | 38 asks · 25 sales strong |
| Rolex 6263 is listed at about A$134,806, while the same reference has been settling at A$134,107 at auction. That is A$698.48 more than the hammer, on 38 asking prices and 25 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16660
|
A$14,668 | A$14,598 | +0.5% In line | 14 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 16660 is listed at about A$14,668, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,598 at auction. That is A$69.85 more than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5970P001
|
A$356,222 | A$354,825 | +0.4% In line | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5970P001 is listed at about A$356,222, while the same reference has been settling at A$354,825 at auction. That is A$1,397 more than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 79173
|
A$7,159 | A$7,152 | +0.1% In line | 80 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 79173 is listed at about A$7,159, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,152 at auction. That is A$6.98 more than the hammer, on 80 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116233
|
A$13,206 | A$13,201 | +0.0% In line | 118 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116233 is listed at about A$13,206, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,201 at auction. That is A$4.89 more than the hammer, on 118 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6105
|
A$16,763 | A$16,763 | +0.0% In line | 3 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 6105 is listed at about A$16,763, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,763 at auction. That is - more than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16520
|
A$42,842 | A$42,914 | -0.2% In line | 63 asks · 23 sales strong |
| Rolex 16520 is listed at about A$42,842, while the same reference has been settling at A$42,914 at auction. That is A$72.64 less than the hammer, on 63 asking prices and 23 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116610LV
|
A$28,218 | A$28,386 | -0.6% In line | 107 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116610LV is listed at about A$28,218, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,386 at auction. That is A$167.63 less than the hammer, on 107 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116680
|
A$26,081 | A$26,402 | -1.2% In line | 25 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116680 is listed at about A$26,081, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,402 at auction. That is A$321.30 less than the hammer, on 25 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116509
|
A$60,767 | A$61,606 | -1.4% In line | 62 asks · 11 sales fair |
| Rolex 116509 is listed at about A$60,767, while the same reference has been settling at A$61,606 at auction. That is A$838.87 less than the hammer, on 62 asking prices and 11 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116660
|
A$15,297 | A$15,520 | -1.4% In line | 130 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 116660 is listed at about A$15,297, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,520 at auction. That is A$223.51 less than the hammer, on 130 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5402ST
|
A$78,229 | A$79,836 | -2.0% In line | 13 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Audemars Piguet 5402ST is listed at about A$78,229, while the same reference has been settling at A$79,836 at auction. That is A$1,606 less than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5205G010
|
A$48,195 | A$49,284 | -2.2% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5205G010 is listed at about A$48,195, while the same reference has been settling at A$49,284 at auction. That is A$1,090 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1680
|
A$20,675 | A$21,405 | -3.4% In line | 140 asks · 38 sales strong |
| Rolex 1680 is listed at about A$20,675, while the same reference has been settling at A$21,405 at auction. That is A$729.91 less than the hammer, on 140 asking prices and 38 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5524G001
|
A$47,496 | A$49,284 | -3.6% In line | 11 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5524G001 is listed at about A$47,496, while the same reference has been settling at A$49,284 at auction. That is A$1,788 less than the hammer, on 11 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116710BLNR
|
A$22,212 | A$23,154 | -4.1% In line | 75 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 116710BLNR is listed at about A$22,212, while the same reference has been settling at A$23,154 at auction. That is A$942.94 less than the hammer, on 75 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16600
|
A$12,658 | A$13,201 | -4.1% In line | 118 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16600 is listed at about A$12,658, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,201 at auction. That is A$543.41 less than the hammer, on 118 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 17014
|
A$10,826 | A$11,296 | -4.2% In line | 5 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 17014 is listed at about A$10,826, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,296 at auction. That is A$469.38 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5066A
|
A$41,210 | A$43,243 | -4.7% In line | 5 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5066A is listed at about A$41,210, while the same reference has been settling at A$43,243 at auction. That is A$2,033 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 18239
|
A$27,241 | A$28,632 | -4.9% In line | 39 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 18239 is listed at about A$27,241, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,632 at auction. That is A$1,391 less than the hammer, on 39 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 1280
|
A$18,091 | A$19,054 | -5.1% In line | 6 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Cartier 1280 is listed at about A$18,091, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,054 at auction. That is A$963.90 less than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 5500
|
A$5,378 | A$5,686 | -5.4% In line | 40 asks · 13 sales fair |
| Rolex 5500 is listed at about A$5,378, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,686 at auction. That is A$307.33 less than the hammer, on 40 asking prices and 13 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16570
|
A$11,951 | A$12,866 | -7.1% In line | 350 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 16570 is listed at about A$11,951, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,866 at auction. That is A$915.00 less than the hammer, on 350 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Richard Mille
Ref. RM1103
|
A$426,768 | A$461,273 | -7.5% In line | 22 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Richard Mille RM1103 is listed at about A$426,768, while the same reference has been settling at A$461,273 at auction. That is A$34,505 less than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18078
|
A$24,440 | A$26,612 | -8.2% In line | 19 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 18078 is listed at about A$24,440, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,612 at auction. That is A$2,172 less than the hammer, on 19 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 326939
|
A$38,626 | A$42,244 | -8.6% In line | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 326939 is listed at about A$38,626, while the same reference has been settling at A$42,244 at auction. That is A$3,618 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1002
|
A$5,588 | A$6,147 | -9.1% In line | 21 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 1002 is listed at about A$5,588, while the same reference has been settling at A$6,147 at auction. That is A$558.78 less than the hammer, on 21 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 118238
|
A$27,415 | A$30,160 | -9.1% In line | 58 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Rolex 118238 is listed at about A$27,415, while the same reference has been settling at A$30,160 at auction. That is A$2,745 less than the hammer, on 58 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. | ||||
|
Cartier
Ref. 1740
|
A$8,556 | A$9,415 | -9.1% In line | 6 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Cartier 1740 is listed at about A$8,556, while the same reference has been settling at A$9,415 at auction. That is A$859.12 less than the hammer, on 6 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116710LN
|
A$17,811 | A$19,599 | -9.1% In line | 130 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 116710LN is listed at about A$17,811, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,599 at auction. That is A$1,788 less than the hammer, on 130 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 6002
|
A$5,658 | A$6,258 | -9.6% In line | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 6002 is listed at about A$5,658, while the same reference has been settling at A$6,258 at auction. That is A$600.69 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 126720VTNR
|
A$24,447 | A$27,101 | -9.8% In line | 56 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 126720VTNR is listed at about A$24,447, while the same reference has been settling at A$27,101 at auction. That is A$2,654 less than the hammer, on 56 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices and auction results are close. The market agrees with itself here. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 126710BLRO
|
A$31,920 | A$35,483 | -10.0% Below auction | 124 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 126710BLRO is listed at about A$31,920, while the same reference has been settling at A$35,483 at auction. That is A$3,563 less than the hammer, on 124 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 69178
|
A$10,337 | A$11,577 | -10.7% Below auction | 104 asks · 12 sales fair |
| Rolex 69178 is listed at about A$10,337, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,577 at auction. That is A$1,240 less than the hammer, on 104 asking prices and 12 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16718
|
A$38,765 | A$43,585 | -11.1% Below auction | 8 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 16718 is listed at about A$38,765, while the same reference has been settling at A$43,585 at auction. That is A$4,819 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116520
|
A$30,627 | A$34,456 | -11.1% Below auction | 164 asks · 16 sales strong |
| Rolex 116520 is listed at about A$30,627, while the same reference has been settling at A$34,456 at auction. That is A$3,828 less than the hammer, on 164 asking prices and 16 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Piaget
Ref. 9154
|
A$5,169 | A$5,839 | -11.5% Below auction | 4 asks · 6 sales thin |
| Piaget 9154 is listed at about A$5,169, while the same reference has been settling at A$5,839 at auction. That is A$670.54 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 6 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16808
|
A$34,225 | A$38,723 | -11.6% Below auction | 9 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16808 is listed at about A$34,225, while the same reference has been settling at A$38,723 at auction. That is A$4,498 less than the hammer, on 9 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14060M
|
A$12,223 | A$13,830 | -11.6% Below auction | 47 asks · 11 sales fair |
| Rolex 14060M is listed at about A$12,223, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,830 at auction. That is A$1,606 less than the hammer, on 47 asking prices and 11 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800/1
|
A$65,307 | A$73,927 | -11.7% Below auction | 16 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Patek Philippe 3800/1 is listed at about A$65,307, while the same reference has been settling at A$73,927 at auction. That is A$8,619 less than the hammer, on 16 asking prices and 7 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16519
|
A$35,098 | A$39,953 | -12.2% Below auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16519 is listed at about A$35,098, while the same reference has been settling at A$39,953 at auction. That is A$4,854 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16613
|
A$13,620 | A$15,646 | -13.0% Below auction | 214 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16613 is listed at about A$13,620, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,646 at auction. That is A$2,026 less than the hammer, on 214 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1601
|
A$6,496 | A$7,482 | -13.2% Below auction | 224 asks · 26 sales strong |
| Rolex 1601 is listed at about A$6,496, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,482 at auction. That is A$986.25 less than the hammer, on 224 asking prices and 26 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3893
|
A$14,458 | A$16,854 | -14.2% Below auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3893 is listed at about A$14,458, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,854 at auction. That is A$2,396 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 118208
|
A$24,447 | A$28,610 | -14.6% Below auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 118208 is listed at about A$24,447, while the same reference has been settling at A$28,610 at auction. That is A$4,163 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16610LV
|
A$21,335 | A$25,355 | -15.9% Below auction | 66 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 16610LV is listed at about A$21,335, while the same reference has been settling at A$25,355 at auction. That is A$4,020 less than the hammer, on 66 asking prices and 7 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1503
|
A$10,477 | A$12,517 | -16.3% Below auction | 16 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 1503 is listed at about A$10,477, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,517 at auction. That is A$2,040 less than the hammer, on 16 asking prices and 8 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Piaget
Ref. 9706
|
A$16,694 | A$20,563 | -18.8% Below auction | 3 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Piaget 9706 is listed at about A$16,694, while the same reference has been settling at A$20,563 at auction. That is A$3,870 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3520
|
A$11,804 | A$14,598 | -19.1% Below auction | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3520 is listed at about A$11,804, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,598 at auction. That is A$2,794 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5980/1A001
|
A$113,851 | A$141,930 | -19.8% Below auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5980/1A001 is listed at about A$113,851, while the same reference has been settling at A$141,930 at auction. That is A$28,079 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 16613T
|
A$12,782 | A$16,093 | -20.6% Below auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 16613T is listed at about A$12,782, while the same reference has been settling at A$16,093 at auction. That is A$3,311 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116610LN
|
A$15,157 | A$19,211 | -21.1% Below auction | 115 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116610LN is listed at about A$15,157, while the same reference has been settling at A$19,211 at auction. That is A$4,054 less than the hammer, on 115 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 19018
|
A$18,754 | A$23,853 | -21.4% Below auction | 18 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 19018 is listed at about A$18,754, while the same reference has been settling at A$23,853 at auction. That is A$5,099 less than the hammer, on 18 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116518
|
A$27,939 | A$35,762 | -21.9% Below auction | 27 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 116518 is listed at about A$27,939, while the same reference has been settling at A$35,762 at auction. That is A$7,823 less than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6241
|
A$275,898 | A$354,825 | -22.2% Below auction | 8 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 6241 is listed at about A$275,898, while the same reference has been settling at A$354,825 at auction. That is A$78,928 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16014
|
A$7,554 | A$9,719 | -22.3% Below auction | 102 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16014 is listed at about A$7,554, while the same reference has been settling at A$9,719 at auction. That is A$2,165 less than the hammer, on 102 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16013
|
A$7,753 | A$10,142 | -23.6% Below auction | 131 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 16013 is listed at about A$7,753, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,142 at auction. That is A$2,389 less than the hammer, on 131 asking prices and 9 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1802
|
A$32,130 | A$42,579 | -24.5% Below auction | 7 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 1802 is listed at about A$32,130, while the same reference has been settling at A$42,579 at auction. That is A$10,449 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5740/1G001
|
A$314,314 | A$416,920 | -24.6% Below auction | 5 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5740/1G001 is listed at about A$314,314, while the same reference has been settling at A$416,920 at auction. That is A$102,606 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 4 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1803
|
A$16,065 | A$21,457 | -25.1% Below auction | 179 asks · 43 sales strong |
| Rolex 1803 is listed at about A$16,065, while the same reference has been settling at A$21,457 at auction. That is A$5,392 less than the hammer, on 179 asking prices and 43 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800
|
A$91,640 | A$123,211 | -25.6% Below auction | 20 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3800 is listed at about A$91,640, while the same reference has been settling at A$123,211 at auction. That is A$31,571 less than the hammer, on 20 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 228206
|
A$91,640 | A$123,211 | -25.6% Below auction | 7 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 228206 is listed at about A$91,640, while the same reference has been settling at A$123,211 at auction. That is A$31,571 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 118205
|
A$28,917 | A$39,031 | -25.9% Below auction | 10 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 118205 is listed at about A$28,917, while the same reference has been settling at A$39,031 at auction. That is A$10,114 less than the hammer, on 10 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Piaget
Ref. 9902
|
A$10,477 | A$14,305 | -26.8% Below auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Piaget 9902 is listed at about A$10,477, while the same reference has been settling at A$14,305 at auction. That is A$3,828 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18238
|
A$27,519 | A$37,615 | -26.8% Below auction | 161 asks · 14 sales fair |
| Rolex 18238 is listed at about A$27,519, while the same reference has been settling at A$37,615 at auction. That is A$10,096 less than the hammer, on 161 asking prices and 14 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18038
|
A$23,120 | A$31,934 | -27.6% Below auction | 156 asks · 35 sales strong |
| Rolex 18038 is listed at about A$23,120, while the same reference has been settling at A$31,934 at auction. That is A$8,815 less than the hammer, on 156 asking prices and 35 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Audemars Piguet
Ref. 5273
|
A$12,782 | A$17,741 | -28.0% Below auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Audemars Piguet 5273 is listed at about A$12,782, while the same reference has been settling at A$17,741 at auction. That is A$4,959 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6265
|
A$114,550 | A$159,671 | -28.3% Below auction | 23 asks · 14 sales fair |
| Rolex 6265 is listed at about A$114,550, while the same reference has been settling at A$159,671 at auction. That is A$45,121 less than the hammer, on 23 asking prices and 14 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5970R001
|
A$202,558 | A$283,860 | -28.6% Below auction | 8 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5970R001 is listed at about A$202,558, while the same reference has been settling at A$283,860 at auction. That is A$81,302 less than the hammer, on 8 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 1625
|
A$7,334 | A$10,309 | -28.9% Below auction | 19 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 1625 is listed at about A$7,334, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,309 at auction. That is A$2,976 less than the hammer, on 19 asking prices and 8 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1665
|
A$23,643 | A$33,401 | -29.2% Below auction | 34 asks · 14 sales fair |
| Rolex 1665 is listed at about A$23,643, while the same reference has been settling at A$33,401 at auction. That is A$9,758 less than the hammer, on 34 asking prices and 14 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3940J
|
A$55,180 | A$79,137 | -30.3% Below auction | 13 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3940J is listed at about A$55,180, while the same reference has been settling at A$79,137 at auction. That is A$23,958 less than the hammer, on 13 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16030
|
A$7,397 | A$10,645 | -30.5% Below auction | 87 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 16030 is listed at about A$7,397, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,645 at auction. That is A$3,248 less than the hammer, on 87 asking prices and 8 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3940
|
A$78,928 | A$115,318 | -31.6% Below auction | 27 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3940 is listed at about A$78,928, while the same reference has been settling at A$115,318 at auction. That is A$36,391 less than the hammer, on 27 asking prices and 5 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 128238
|
A$71,936 | A$105,609 | -31.9% Below auction | 15 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 128238 is listed at about A$71,936, while the same reference has been settling at A$105,609 at auction. That is A$33,673 less than the hammer, on 15 asking prices and 3 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116519
|
A$41,174 | A$62,094 | -33.7% Below auction | 52 asks · 11 sales fair |
| Rolex 116519 is listed at about A$41,174, while the same reference has been settling at A$62,094 at auction. That is A$20,920 less than the hammer, on 52 asking prices and 11 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6917
|
A$6,077 | A$9,170 | -33.7% Below auction | 69 asks · 20 sales strong |
| Rolex 6917 is listed at about A$6,077, while the same reference has been settling at A$9,170 at auction. That is A$3,094 less than the hammer, on 69 asking prices and 20 sales. Dealers are asking less than recent auction results. Either the hammer ran hot or retail has not caught up. | ||||
|
Franck Muller
Ref. 2852
|
A$6,636 | A$10,467 | -36.6% Far below auction | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Franck Muller 2852 is listed at about A$6,636, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,467 at auction. That is A$3,832 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 116505
|
A$53,433 | A$85,158 | -37.3% Far below auction | 22 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 116505 is listed at about A$53,433, while the same reference has been settling at A$85,158 at auction. That is A$31,725 less than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Blancpain
Ref. 6595
|
A$4,540 | A$7,461 | -39.2% Far below auction | 5 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Blancpain 6595 is listed at about A$4,540, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,461 at auction. That is A$2,921 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5711/1A010
|
A$135,504 | A$228,820 | -40.8% Far below auction | 5 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5711/1A010 is listed at about A$135,504, while the same reference has been settling at A$228,820 at auction. That is A$93,316 less than the hammer, on 5 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 6694
|
A$4,680 | A$7,921 | -40.9% Far below auction | 44 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Rolex 6694 is listed at about A$4,680, while the same reference has been settling at A$7,921 at auction. That is A$3,241 less than the hammer, on 44 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 3800/1A
|
A$43,655 | A$74,143 | -41.1% Far below auction | 14 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 3800/1A is listed at about A$43,655, while the same reference has been settling at A$74,143 at auction. That is A$30,488 less than the hammer, on 14 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 6305
|
A$67,752 | A$115,318 | -41.3% Far below auction | 4 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 6305 is listed at about A$67,752, while the same reference has been settling at A$115,318 at auction. That is A$47,566 less than the hammer, on 4 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16234
|
A$9,080 | A$15,517 | -41.5% Far below auction | 167 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16234 is listed at about A$9,080, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,517 at auction. That is A$6,436 less than the hammer, on 167 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
|
Patek Philippe
Ref. 5575G001
|
A$118,741 | A$204,025 | -41.8% Far below auction | 3 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Patek Philippe 5575G001 is listed at about A$118,741, while the same reference has been settling at A$204,025 at auction. That is A$85,284 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 118239
|
A$28,323 | A$49,173 | -42.4% Far below auction | 32 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 118239 is listed at about A$28,323, while the same reference has been settling at A$49,173 at auction. That is A$20,849 less than the hammer, on 32 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16528
|
A$53,783 | A$96,040 | -44.0% Far below auction | 29 asks · 8 sales fair |
| Rolex 16528 is listed at about A$53,783, while the same reference has been settling at A$96,040 at auction. That is A$42,258 less than the hammer, on 29 asking prices and 8 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 16550
|
A$16,763 | A$30,873 | -45.7% Far below auction | 7 asks · 4 sales thin |
| Rolex 16550 is listed at about A$16,763, while the same reference has been settling at A$30,873 at auction. That is A$14,110 less than the hammer, on 7 asking prices and 4 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 124300
|
A$13,690 | A$26,402 | -48.2% Far below auction | 175 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 124300 is listed at about A$13,690, while the same reference has been settling at A$26,402 at auction. That is A$12,712 less than the hammer, on 175 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79030N
|
A$5,553 | A$10,757 | -48.4% Far below auction | 60 asks · 7 sales fair |
| Tudor 79030N is listed at about A$5,553, while the same reference has been settling at A$10,757 at auction. That is A$5,204 less than the hammer, on 60 asking prices and 7 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
|
Rolex
Ref. 3131
|
A$5,867 | A$11,623 | -49.5% Far below auction | 3 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 3131 is listed at about A$5,867, while the same reference has been settling at A$11,623 at auction. That is A$5,755 less than the hammer, on 3 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 25407N
|
A$6,388 | A$13,715 | -53.4% Far below auction | 22 asks · 6 sales fair |
| Tudor 25407N is listed at about A$6,388, while the same reference has been settling at A$13,715 at auction. That is A$7,327 less than the hammer, on 22 asking prices and 6 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 18039
|
A$27,932 | A$62,094 | -55.0% Far below auction | 17 asks · 5 sales thin |
| Rolex 18039 is listed at about A$27,932, while the same reference has been settling at A$62,094 at auction. That is A$34,162 less than the hammer, on 17 asking prices and 5 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 1500
|
A$5,308 | A$12,419 | -57.3% Far below auction | 97 asks · 9 sales fair |
| Rolex 1500 is listed at about A$5,308, while the same reference has been settling at A$12,419 at auction. That is A$7,110 less than the hammer, on 97 asking prices and 9 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. | ||||
Rolex
Ref. 14000
|
A$6,496 | A$15,366 | -57.7% Far below auction | 153 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Rolex 14000 is listed at about A$6,496, while the same reference has been settling at A$15,366 at auction. That is A$8,871 less than the hammer, on 153 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Tudor
Ref. 79360N
|
A$6,286 | A$22,882 | -72.5% Far below auction | 57 asks · 3 sales thin |
| Tudor 79360N is listed at about A$6,286, while the same reference has been settling at A$22,882 at auction. That is A$16,596 less than the hammer, on 57 asking prices and 3 sales. Asking prices sit far under settled results. Check the sales are the same specification before reading anything into it. Evidence is thin here, so treat the figure loosely. | ||||
Figures are recorded in USD and converted to your selected currency. Medians, not averages, so one exceptional example cannot move a figure. Every pair needs at least three asking prices and three sales, brand must match, and only USD auction results within three years are counted. Last rebuilt 26 Aug 2026.